Re: stupid segfaults -- argh!

["Joe Van Dyk" <joevandyk gmail com>]

On 6/24/06, Joe Van Dyk <joevandyk gmail com> wrote:
> On 6/7/06, Joe Van Dyk <joevandyk gmail com> wrote:
> > On 6/6/06, Paul Davis <paul linuxaudiosystems com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 17:40 -0700, Joe Van Dyk wrote:
> > > > I wonder why the documentation says a Gtk::Main object can't be
> > > > created in the global scope.  Apparently, that's what I want to do, as
> > > > I can't put it inside main().
> > >
> > > GTK and gtkmm require library initialization before any objects related
> > > to them can be created. by attempting to put Gtk::Main in global scope
> > > you are effectively asking for this order to be reversed.
> >
> > If I have Gtk::Main outside of any classes or functions (global scope,
> > right?), what "related" objects would be created before Gtk::Main was
> > called?

Anyone?  I'm confused why having the call to Gtk::Main at file scope is bad.