Re: Expander's activate signal

[Marko Anastasov <marko marko anastasov name>]

(I haven't looked at the list messages since Thursday, so this comes
a bit late.)

Thanks Murray for pointing that out, now I realize that the docs
in the Fedora package are old enough and lack those two passages
("Normally...") and that I should simply download and use the latest.

P.S. It's not in the 2.8.2 archive as well though, and is in gtkmm-docs.
I guess it was added in the meantime.

On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 12:22 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > Hi Marko,
> >
> > i guess you can use something like:
> >
> > the_expander .property_expanded() .signal_changed() .connect(
> >    		sigc::mem_fun(*this, &your_class::your_function) );
> 
> Yes, whatever you read/copied that made you want to use the "activate"
> signal, it's wrong:
> http://www.gtkmm.org/docs/gtkmm-2.4/docs/reference/html/classGtk_1_1Expander.html
> 
> > On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 23:21 +0100, Marko Anastasov wrote:
> >> Hello, today I noticed that Expander seems to lack a SignalProxy
> >> for signal_activate. I got this error message as I tried to compile
> >> usual signal connecting code:
> >>
> >> error: ¡class Gtk::Expander¢ has no member named ¡signal_activate¢.
> >>
> >> I'm using Fedora 4 with version 2.6.2 but I also checked the header
> >> in the latest (2.8.2) source package from the GNOME ftp site, and it's
> >> not there either.
> >> It's my first project with gtkmm so it's possible that I missed
> >> something. Or it is yet to be added...?
> 
> 
> Murray Cumming
> murrayc murrayc com
> www.murrayc.com
> www.openismus.com
> 
> 
>