Re: Update for the gtkmm tutorial about Debian

[Jonathon Jongsma <jonathon jongsma gmail com>]

While I can't speak for anybody else, I've found that contributions
and criticisms are quite welcome.  Like all open-source projects,
there's a shortage of manpower so obviously bugs with a patch attached
are likely to be implemented more quickly.
It's always good to have more people using gtkmm.  As you're learning,
feel free to suggest ways that the documentation is unclear or could
be improved as well.

Jonner

On 1/19/06, Pierre THIERRY <nowhere man levallois eu org> wrote:
> As I'm discovering Gtkmm, I must say I very enthusiastic about it,
> because it seems to be the only C++ graphical toolkit out there that
> really leverage all C++ capabilities and avoids C-isms like using
> plenties of macros and so on (it also avoids adding a specific extension
> to C++ in the form of a mandatory preprocessor...). [in fact, there are
> surely many others, but not as far as maturity and stability are
> concerned]
>
> As I'm a great fanatic of OOP, I'm very critical about adherence to it's
> paradigm and idioms. Is the Gtkmm team open to such critics, and willing
> to improve the toolkit on this field? Or is it just open to critics and
> patch but not willing to take time from other tasks for this particular
> one? Or not willing to hear anything like "this could be more cleanly
> object oriented here"?
>
> I hope to be able to contribute as soon as possible to Gtkmm, on code
> and documentation!
>
> Gratefully,
> Nowhere man
> --
> nowhere man levallois eu org
> OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFDz9qQxe13INnVDYoRAv5lAKCidjGmHdBJDrGkTnqjb2VUkVe+2ACeN3qY
> JwyQkn3Mf8xIEGDcuY0zMpM=
> =yR2M
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>