Re: Using (or not using) sigc::mem_fun with the G_CALLBACK macro
- From: "Murray Cumming" <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: "Chris Vine" <chris cvine freeserve co uk>
- Cc: paul linuxaudiosystems com, gtkmm-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Using (or not using) sigc::mem_fun with the G_CALLBACK macro
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 00:24:53 +0200 (CEST)
> You should really use a function with C linkage as the proxy (probably in
> anonymous namespace so it is not exported). Static member functions are
> not
> guaranteed to have the C linkage. On g++ they do, but I believe on the
> Intel
> compiler as an example they do not,
It does work on g++, SUN CC, AIX, Irix, and HP-UX compilers, however. I
think it works on the ARM compiler. I don't know about the Intel compiler.
Let's not confuse him with irrelevant details. However, there's a bug
about this, and patches are welcome.
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]