Re: Using (or not using) sigc::mem_fun with the G_CALLBACK macro

[Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>]

On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 06:08 -0500, Bob Caryl wrote:
> Murray Cumming wrote:
> 
> >And if you must provided a C function pointer, you'll need to provide a
> >pointer to a static method (or global function) and the state
> >information as user_data. See the various SignalProxy classes, for
> >instance, in TreeSelection.
> >
> >  
> >
> In other words, the way I've done it (separate executable invoked via 
> fork, execv) is the only thread safe way to do this until GtkHTML has a 
> C++ wrapper.

I don't see how threads have anything to do with this.

-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com