On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 13:55:30 -0500, Paul Davis wrote: > >No, I am not. I am confusing it with the signature of the underlying > >(C level) signal, which always includes the emitting GObject. > > there is no underlying C-level signal to a SigC++ signal unless its a > SigC++ signal that is used to notify about C-level signals. perhaps > that is what you meant. sorry if this appears pedantic. Since we are talking about Gtkmm, I supposed we are talking about Gtkmm signal, which is a wrapper around Gtk signal and thus does have C-level signal, so that is what I meant. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jan 'Bulb' Hudec <bulb ucw cz>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature