Re: signals and copy constructors
- From: Paul Davis <paul linuxaudiosystems com>
- To: Jan Hudec <bulb ucw cz>
- Cc: Carl Nygard <cjnygard fast net>, gtkmm-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: signals and copy constructors
- Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 13:55:30 -0500
>
>No, I am not. I am confusing it with the signature of the underlying
>(C level) signal, which always includes the emitting GObject.
there is no underlying C-level signal to a SigC++ signal unless its a
SigC++ signal that is used to notify about C-level signals. perhaps
that is what you meant. sorry if this appears pedantic.
--p
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
