Re: gtkmm capabilities

[Roel Vanhout <roel riks nl>]

> On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 13:13 -0700, John Taber wrote:
> > > > Our concerns in a nutshell:
> > > > gtkmm: we like the clean c++ syntax but scary library dependencies for
> > > > static builds,  is it cross-platform enough(especially Windows), missing
> > > > html viewer, is librsvg cross-platform?

Unless your project is licensed under an LGPL compatible license, gtkmm 
is not an option for you if you want to link it statically.

> > > > Qt: pretty good but so damn expensive, vendor lock-in, hard to use
> > > > makefiles due to moc,

I like gtkmm better than I like Qt so don't get me wrong here, but if 
3000$ is too much (compared to the expected revenue of your product and 
the time you'll have to spend writing things yourself) than you better 
think over your business plan again.


cheers,

roel