Re: Quick question about glibmm



On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 10:29 +0100, Nick Chorley wrote:
> I had a look in the archives first, but couldn't find anything about 
> this. Is it ok to use glibmm-2.6.1? The gtkmm site says glibmm-2.6.x is 
> stable, but the readme file in the archive I downloaded says, "This is 
> the unstable version of gtkmm, aimed at Gtk+ 2.0.x". I just want to be 
> sure about what I'm installing and am assuming that it's just the wrong 
> readme file in the archive or something?
Yes, the readme appears to be out of date.  You've got the right thing.

John





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]