Re: Backward compatibility

[Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>]

On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 09:55 -0600, John Taber wrote:
> We appreciate the new releases.  But based on several other posts here, I 
> think a web page that shows a more detailed listing of all the g* lib 
> requirements for each gtkmm release would be most helpful - with a bunch of 
> gtk and gtkmm releases, and different availability on different distros, it 
> is getting difficult to make sure we have a matching lib set.  I'm even 
> having trouble figuring out what to apt-get on a machine right now.  

It's your distros job to provide gtkmm dependencies.

But if you want to provide a more detailed version of the www.gtkmm.org
download page, please start by creating a page on the live.gnome.org
wiki.

> On Thursday 28 April 2005 06:18, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 09:05 -0300, Alfredo Kojima wrote:
> > > :) The problem is that even "decent" distros will not have 2.4 if
> > >
> > > they're not reasonably recent and I need to support them, since
> > > they're often common in many companies...
> >
> > That's life. Use whatever version your target platform has, or can
> > install, and encourage the use of distros that manage this properly.
> >
> > We can't do time travel for you. And we won't stop releasing new
> > features just because you want to use them too much.
> _______________________________________________
> gtkmm-list mailing list
> gtkmm-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com