Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #799 - 3 msgs

[gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net]

Send Gtkmm-forge mailing list submissions to
	gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	gtkmm-forge-admin lists sourceforge net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gtkmm-forge digest..."


gtkmm-forge is the mailing list that receives gtkmm bug reports from bugzilla.  A daily digest is sent to gtkmm-main, to encourage people to help fixing the bugs. Do not try to unsubscribe gtkmm-forge from gtkmm-list.


Today's Topics:

   1. [Bug 157401] PATCH: MSVC demo build fixes, new .cvsignore files (bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org)
   2. [Bug 157401] PATCH: MSVC demo build fixes, new .cvsignore files (bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org)
   3. [Bug 157468] New: Naming conventions: Statusbar, vs ProgressBar. (bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org)

--__--__--

Message: 1
From: bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Fri,  5 Nov 2004 03:15:11 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 157401] PATCH: MSVC demo build fixes, new .cvsignore files

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157401
gtkmm | build | Ver: 2.4





------- Additional Comments From cgustin ibelgique com  2004-11-05 03:15 -------
Thanks.

Next time, could you please mention that your .cvsignore attachment was in fact
a .tar.gz ?

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.


--__--__--

Message: 2
From: bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Fri,  5 Nov 2004 05:51:55 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 157401] PATCH: MSVC demo build fixes, new .cvsignore files

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157401
gtkmm | build | Ver: 2.4





------- Additional Comments From murrayc murrayc com  2004-11-05 05:51 -------
Thanks. The patch looks OK to me, apart from this part:

- type_slotDo slot = row[columns.slot];
+ type_slotDo slot = row.get_value(columns.slot);

That really should work. Please put it in an #ifdef for now if it doesn't, but
show us the compile error.

I leave it to Cedric to actually apply win32 stuff.



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.


--__--__--

Message: 3
From: bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Fri,  5 Nov 2004 14:24:08 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 157468] New: Naming conventions: Statusbar, vs ProgressBar.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157468
gtkmm | general | Ver: 2.4

           Summary: Naming conventions: Statusbar, vs ProgressBar.
           Product: gtkmm
           Version: 2.4
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: minor
          Priority: Normal
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
        ReportedBy: nikal nucleus com


Shouldn't these be consistent in their capitalization of the word "bar".  It
just makes more sense to have a rule, and follow it for all of these namings.

If this can't be changed for compatability's sake, perhaps a typedef of somesort
would be nice.

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.



--__--__--

_______________________________________________
Gtkmm-forge mailing list
Gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge


End of Gtkmm-forge Digest