Re: [gtkmm] the future of gtkmm
- From: "Paul Grenyer" <paul paulgrenyer co uk>
- To: Matthew Walton <matthew alledora co uk>, Paul Grenyer <paul paulgrenyer co uk>, gtkmm-list <gtkmm-list gnome org>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: [gtkmm] the future of gtkmm
- Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 14:58:35 +0100
Hi
> As gtkmm exhibits. Smartpointers are something I've not really looked
> into properly yet - I suspect perhaps that if I tried using them at
> work I'd get taken out and shot. We still seem half stuck in C most
> days :-(
So you're not exception safe either? I feel very strongly that a C++
application that is using dynamically allocated bojects and not using
smart pointers is like a loaded gun with the safety take off and a
small child in the vacinity.
>
> > If you are an ACCU (www.accu.org) member read my article in the
latest
> > overload. If you are not, join, it's the best £25 you'll ever spend
as
> > a developer. I'll try and get my article onto my webiste for
everyone
> > else.
>
> I'm not a member. Looks interesting though.
I'll try and pull my finger out and get it on my site.
Regards
Paul
Paul Grenyer
Email: paul paulgrenyer co uk
Web: http://www.paulgrenyer.co.uk
Have you met Aeryn: http://www.paulgrenyer.co.uk/aeryn/?
Version 0.3.0 beta now available for download.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]