Re: [gtkmm] Probably a stupid Gtk+ question
- From: Paul Davis <paul linuxaudiosystems com>
- To: Nathan Hurst <njh hawthorn csse monash edu au>
- Cc: Carl Nygard <cjnygard fast net>, gtkmm-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [gtkmm] Probably a stupid Gtk+ question
- Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 11:44:37 -0500
>>a *lot* to do with it. binding scheme/perl/ruby/php/python to C++ is
>>to all effects and purposes so hard as to be impractical. when you add
>>in the instability of the C++ ABI, even if you loved C++, its a pretty
>>clear choice.
>>
>This is not particularly true. I've written python interfaces to pure
>C++ libraries without trauma. I don't think even FuzzyBaseClass isn't
>the problem that people claim it is.
you either to have export "extern C" static functions, or you have to
know how names are mangled. you can't call a C++ function unless
one of those two things has been done. either one of them is pretty
problematic.
--p
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]