[gtkmm] Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #593 - 5 msgs



Send Gtkmm-forge mailing list submissions to
	gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	gtkmm-forge-admin lists sourceforge net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gtkmm-forge digest..."


gtkmm-forge is the mailing list that receives gtkmm bug reports from bugzilla.  A daily digest is sent to gtkmm-main, to encourage people to help fixing the bugs.


Today's Topics:

   1. [Bug 124297] Changed - Need a custom TreeModel example (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   2. [Bug 131019] New - TreeStore has no decent performance on massive inserts (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   3. [Bug 131019] Changed - TreeStore has no decent performance on massive inserts (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   4. [Bug 131019] Changed - TreeStore has no decent performance on massive inserts (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   5. [Bug 129210] Changed - gtkmm-2.3.1 does not build with gcc 2.95 (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)

--__--__--

Message: 1
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, murrayc usa net
Cc: 
Date: Fri,  9 Jan 2004 11:06:46 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 124297] Changed - Need a custom TreeModel example

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124297

Changed by christof petig-baender de 

--- shadow/124297	Fri Oct 10 11:07:25 2003
+++ shadow/124297.tmp.22337	Fri Jan  9 11:06:46 2004
@@ -14,6 +14,11 @@
 URL: 
 Summary: Need a custom TreeModel example
 
 Some people have managed to implement custom Gtk::TreeModels, but they seem
 to be using strange hacky techniques. It needs to register a GType, but
 that should be similar to the custom cell renderer.
+
+------- Additional Comments From christof petig-baender de  2004-01-09 11:06 -------
+Created an attachment (id=23167)
+Feel free to simplify the GObject related stuff
+


--__--__--

Message: 2
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Fri,  9 Jan 2004 11:15:16 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 131019] New - TreeStore has no decent performance on massive inserts

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131019

Changed by christof petig-baender de 

--- shadow/131019	Fri Jan  9 11:15:16 2004
+++ shadow/131019.tmp.28018	Fri Jan  9 11:15:16 2004
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+Bug#: 131019
+Product: gtkmm
+Version: 2.2
+OS: Linux
+OS Details: 
+Status: NEW   
+Resolution: 
+Severity: enhancement
+Priority: Normal
+Component: TreeView
+AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
+ReportedBy: christof petig-baender de               
+TargetMilestone: ---
+URL: 
+Summary: TreeStore has no decent performance on massive inserts
+
+As reported by several people on the net there seems to be a performance
+problem with Gtk::TreeStore insertions.
+
+I personally have seen more than 30seconds for inserting 10k lines when
+generating a tree out of a linear multi-columned list. My std::map based
+custom model manages 100k in less than 2 seconds (300MHz G3 powerpc).
+
+I'm going to simplify my example down to one file.


--__--__--

Message: 3
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Fri,  9 Jan 2004 11:37:02 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 131019] Changed - TreeStore has no decent performance on massive inserts

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131019

Changed by christof petig-baender de 

--- shadow/131019	Fri Jan  9 11:15:16 2004
+++ shadow/131019.tmp.9200	Fri Jan  9 11:37:02 2004
@@ -19,6 +19,11 @@
 
 I personally have seen more than 30seconds for inserting 10k lines when
 generating a tree out of a linear multi-columned list. My std::map based
 custom model manages 100k in less than 2 seconds (300MHz G3 powerpc).
 
 I'm going to simplify my example down to one file.
+
+------- Additional Comments From christof petig-baender de  2004-01-09 11:37 -------
+Created an attachment (id=23168)
+reported at http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-list/2003-March/msg00361.html
+


--__--__--

Message: 4
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Fri,  9 Jan 2004 11:48:12 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 131019] Changed - TreeStore has no decent performance on massive inserts

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131019

Changed by christof petig-baender de 

--- shadow/131019	Fri Jan  9 11:37:02 2004
+++ shadow/131019.tmp.17553	Fri Jan  9 11:48:12 2004
@@ -24,6 +24,14 @@
 I'm going to simplify my example down to one file.
 
 ------- Additional Comments From christof petig-baender de  2004-01-09 11:37 -------
 Created an attachment (id=23168)
 reported at http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-list/2003-March/msg00361.html
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From christof petig-baender de  2004-01-09 11:48 -------
+See also the mailing list thread at
+http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtkmm-list/2003-October/msg00090.html
+
+[I admit that I do no longer remember the exect timings but it was
+simply too much and more O(N^2+) than O(N logN).]
+


--__--__--

Message: 5
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, dalgoda ix netcom com
Cc: 
Date: Fri,  9 Jan 2004 12:23:25 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 129210] Changed - gtkmm-2.3.1 does not build with gcc 2.95

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129210

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/129210	Wed Jan  7 14:45:38 2004
+++ shadow/129210.tmp.5563	Fri Jan  9 12:23:25 2004
@@ -215,6 +215,22 @@
 
 Well, that's a lot of babbling.  :->
 
 I guess it could all be summarized with this:  Go ahead and require
 modern C++ features, but try to catch support for them up front with
 autoconf.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2004-01-09 12:23 -------
+> if there was NNTP interface available, I'd use it
+
+Apparently these people have a newsgroup gateway:
+http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=gtkmm&r=1&w=2#gtkmm
+
+Thanks. So, you seem to need gcc 2.9* becuase your need it to build
+your kernel. Other mainstream distros don't have this problem - I
+guess that they either use 2 compilers or they can compile the kernel
+and user space apps with the same compiler. So I believe that it is
+not a real problem. Of course, I also believe that linuxfromscratch
+people actually enjoy having these problems.
+
+So, I guess we'll drop the gcc 2.9* support. But thanks for showing us
+that we needed to think about it.



--__--__--

_______________________________________________
Gtkmm-forge mailing list
Gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge


End of Gtkmm-forge Digest



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]