[gtkmm] Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #593 - 5 msgs
- From: gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net
- To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
- Subject: [gtkmm] Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #593 - 5 msgs
- Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 20:01:57 -0800
Send Gtkmm-forge mailing list submissions to
gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net
You can reach the person managing the list at
gtkmm-forge-admin lists sourceforge net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gtkmm-forge digest..."
gtkmm-forge is the mailing list that receives gtkmm bug reports from bugzilla. A daily digest is sent to gtkmm-main, to encourage people to help fixing the bugs.
Today's Topics:
1. [Bug 124297] Changed - Need a custom TreeModel example (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
2. [Bug 131019] New - TreeStore has no decent performance on massive inserts (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
3. [Bug 131019] Changed - TreeStore has no decent performance on massive inserts (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
4. [Bug 131019] Changed - TreeStore has no decent performance on massive inserts (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
5. [Bug 129210] Changed - gtkmm-2.3.1 does not build with gcc 2.95 (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
--__--__--
Message: 1
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, murrayc usa net
Cc:
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:06:46 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 124297] Changed - Need a custom TreeModel example
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124297
Changed by christof petig-baender de
--- shadow/124297 Fri Oct 10 11:07:25 2003
+++ shadow/124297.tmp.22337 Fri Jan 9 11:06:46 2004
@@ -14,6 +14,11 @@
URL:
Summary: Need a custom TreeModel example
Some people have managed to implement custom Gtk::TreeModels, but they seem
to be using strange hacky techniques. It needs to register a GType, but
that should be similar to the custom cell renderer.
+
+------- Additional Comments From christof petig-baender de 2004-01-09 11:06 -------
+Created an attachment (id=23167)
+Feel free to simplify the GObject related stuff
+
--__--__--
Message: 2
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc:
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:15:16 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 131019] New - TreeStore has no decent performance on massive inserts
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131019
Changed by christof petig-baender de
--- shadow/131019 Fri Jan 9 11:15:16 2004
+++ shadow/131019.tmp.28018 Fri Jan 9 11:15:16 2004
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+Bug#: 131019
+Product: gtkmm
+Version: 2.2
+OS: Linux
+OS Details:
+Status: NEW
+Resolution:
+Severity: enhancement
+Priority: Normal
+Component: TreeView
+AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
+ReportedBy: christof petig-baender de
+TargetMilestone: ---
+URL:
+Summary: TreeStore has no decent performance on massive inserts
+
+As reported by several people on the net there seems to be a performance
+problem with Gtk::TreeStore insertions.
+
+I personally have seen more than 30seconds for inserting 10k lines when
+generating a tree out of a linear multi-columned list. My std::map based
+custom model manages 100k in less than 2 seconds (300MHz G3 powerpc).
+
+I'm going to simplify my example down to one file.
--__--__--
Message: 3
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc:
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:37:02 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 131019] Changed - TreeStore has no decent performance on massive inserts
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131019
Changed by christof petig-baender de
--- shadow/131019 Fri Jan 9 11:15:16 2004
+++ shadow/131019.tmp.9200 Fri Jan 9 11:37:02 2004
@@ -19,6 +19,11 @@
I personally have seen more than 30seconds for inserting 10k lines when
generating a tree out of a linear multi-columned list. My std::map based
custom model manages 100k in less than 2 seconds (300MHz G3 powerpc).
I'm going to simplify my example down to one file.
+
+------- Additional Comments From christof petig-baender de 2004-01-09 11:37 -------
+Created an attachment (id=23168)
+reported at http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-list/2003-March/msg00361.html
+
--__--__--
Message: 4
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc:
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:48:12 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 131019] Changed - TreeStore has no decent performance on massive inserts
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131019
Changed by christof petig-baender de
--- shadow/131019 Fri Jan 9 11:37:02 2004
+++ shadow/131019.tmp.17553 Fri Jan 9 11:48:12 2004
@@ -24,6 +24,14 @@
I'm going to simplify my example down to one file.
------- Additional Comments From christof petig-baender de 2004-01-09 11:37 -------
Created an attachment (id=23168)
reported at http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-list/2003-March/msg00361.html
+
+------- Additional Comments From christof petig-baender de 2004-01-09 11:48 -------
+See also the mailing list thread at
+http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtkmm-list/2003-October/msg00090.html
+
+[I admit that I do no longer remember the exect timings but it was
+simply too much and more O(N^2+) than O(N logN).]
+
--__--__--
Message: 5
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, dalgoda ix netcom com
Cc:
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:23:25 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 129210] Changed - gtkmm-2.3.1 does not build with gcc 2.95
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129210
Changed by murrayc usa net
--- shadow/129210 Wed Jan 7 14:45:38 2004
+++ shadow/129210.tmp.5563 Fri Jan 9 12:23:25 2004
@@ -215,6 +215,22 @@
Well, that's a lot of babbling. :->
I guess it could all be summarized with this: Go ahead and require
modern C++ features, but try to catch support for them up front with
autoconf.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net 2004-01-09 12:23 -------
+> if there was NNTP interface available, I'd use it
+
+Apparently these people have a newsgroup gateway:
+http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=gtkmm&r=1&w=2#gtkmm
+
+Thanks. So, you seem to need gcc 2.9* becuase your need it to build
+your kernel. Other mainstream distros don't have this problem - I
+guess that they either use 2 compilers or they can compile the kernel
+and user space apps with the same compiler. So I believe that it is
+not a real problem. Of course, I also believe that linuxfromscratch
+people actually enjoy having these problems.
+
+So, I guess we'll drop the gcc 2.9* support. But thanks for showing us
+that we needed to think about it.
--__--__--
_______________________________________________
Gtkmm-forge mailing list
Gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
End of Gtkmm-forge Digest
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]