[gtkmm] Re: Custom TreeModel (was RE: signals versus vfuncs)
- From: Christof Petig <christof petig-baender de>
- To: Murray Cumming Comneon com
- Cc: gtkmm-list gnome org
- Subject: [gtkmm] Re: Custom TreeModel (was RE: signals versus vfuncs)
- Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 17:50:58 +0100
Murray Cumming Comneon com schrieb:
I don't think a simple test case should be too difficult. But even if
you don't put a test case in bugzilla, please report your suspicion
to bugzilla and maybe someone else will test the theory with test
cases.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131019
Perhaps I might code an trivial example in C++ with Gtk::TreeModel
vs. GtkTreeModel. If you _really_ want to analyze this.
I do. gtkmm should not require you to write a custom tree model to
get better performance, unless GTK+ also requires it. And I won't try
to solve such a problem until I know that such a problem exists.
I'll give it a go.
OK, that's horrible. You should never have to create the GCLass
yourself, or write those C callbacks. And I don't think we do that in
our custom cellrenderer example. Please add your example code here:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124297 and I will try to
get around to it later.
done
Christof
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]