[gtkmm] Re: Custom TreeModel (was RE: signals versus vfuncs)



Murray Cumming Comneon com schrieb:
I don't think a simple test case should be too difficult. But even if
you don't put a test case in bugzilla, please report your suspicion
to bugzilla and maybe someone else will test the theory with test
cases.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131019

Perhaps I might code an trivial example in C++ with Gtk::TreeModel
vs. GtkTreeModel. If you _really_ want to analyze this.

I do. gtkmm should not require you to write a custom tree model to
get better performance, unless GTK+ also requires it. And I won't try
to solve such a problem until I know that such a problem exists.


I'll give it a go.

OK, that's horrible. You should never have to create the GCLass
yourself, or write those C callbacks. And I don't think we do that in
our custom cellrenderer example. Please add your example code here: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124297 and I will try to
get around to it later.

done

   Christof




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]