Re: [gtkmm] ANNOUNCE: gtkmm 2.2.8
- From: "B. Bell" <bradleyb u washington edu>
- To: Chris Vine <chris cvine freeserve co uk>
- Cc: murrayc usa net, gtkmm-list <gtkmm-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [gtkmm] ANNOUNCE: gtkmm 2.2.8
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:57:33 -0700 (PDT)
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Chris Vine wrote:
> On Monday 29 September 2003 6:05 pm, Murray Cumming wrote:
>
> > 2.2.8:
> >
> > * Fixed "inacccessible base" build errors with gcc 3.3.2. (Bradley Bell)
>
> gcc-3.3.2 doesn't exist. Is it a good idea to patch gtkmm to deal with bugs
> in gcc snapshots, particularly as I think we have substituted
> reinterpret_casts for valid uses of static_cast?
Can you explain why you think a static_cast should be valid here?
It seems to me that this behavior is also present in gcc 3.3.1 [see bug
117494], but was reverted for a short while, presumably because the error
message produced was unhelpful.
-brad
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]