Re: [gtkmm] gtkmm 2.4 and gcc <3.2

[Paul Davis <paul linuxaudiosystems com>]

>On Tue, 2003-10-21 at 12:29, Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote:
>> If we use libsigc++ 2 in gtkmm 2.4, this will probably make it impossible to
>> build it with gcc versions older than 3.2. Does anybody have a violent
>> objection to that?
>
>Given the improvements in libsigc++ 2 which have been discussed over the
>last few days, I'd be quite happy with this. gcc 3.2 seems to have
>spread sufficiently now that it's not too much of a hardship to require
>it for building your programs - and it does make coding decent C++
>somewhat easier.

<delurk>
no problem from my perspective.