RE: [gtkmm] TreeView Model, SEGV on append

["Ohrnberger, Erik" <erik_ohrnberger dme net>]

Murray,
	Thanks.  

	Just trying to figure out what the heck's going on here on this.

	Erik.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Murray Cumming Comneon com [mailto:Murray Cumming Comneon com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 2:02 PM
> To: erik_ohrnberger dme net; gtkmm-list gnome org
> Subject: RE: [gtkmm] TreeView Model, SEGV on append
> 
> 
> Ohrnberger, Erik wrote:
> > Just a question on construction means and order for the Gtkmm 
> > objects that I'm using and sub classing from.
> > 
> > If I follow the order of construction from beginning to end, 
> > I see that some are dynamic and some are automatic.  What I 
> > mean that in some cases to create a new object instance I do this:
> [snip]
> > Are both of these means for constructing Gtk containing and 
> > Gtk subclassed object instances valid?
> 
> Yes. This is C++.
> 
> > Can both of these methods be used at the same time?
> 
> Yes. This is C++.
> 
> >  What I 
> > mean to say is that a containing class may be dynamic, while 
> > some of it's contained widgets may be either dynamic or 
> > automatic (second example).
> 
> Yes. This is C++.
> 
> > Is there any particular advantage in doing it one way over 
> > the other?  If so, what would it be?  Is it just for the sake 
> > of consistency?
> 
> It's just personal choice, I think.
> 
> Murray Cumming
> www.murrayc.com
> murrayc usa net
>