[gtkmm] Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #372 - 1 msg

[gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net]

Send Gtkmm-forge mailing list submissions to
	gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	gtkmm-forge-admin lists sourceforge net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gtkmm-forge digest..."


gtkmm-forge is the mailing list that receives gtkmm bug reports from bugzilla.  A daily digest is sent to gtkmm-main, to encourage people to help fixing the bugs.


Today's Topics:

   1. [Bug 108240] Changed - Examples/book source files not installed by 'make install' (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)

--__--__--

Message: 1
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 05:50:01 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 108240] Changed - Examples/book source files not installed by 'make install'

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108240

Changed by cgustin ibelgique com 

--- shadow/108240	Sat Mar 15 09:05:27 2003
+++ shadow/108240.tmp.13961	Mon Mar 17 05:50:01 2003
@@ -151,6 +151,23 @@
 
 Applied. Thanks again.
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-03-15 09:05 -------
 make distcheck now fails in the examples dir, with "no rule to make
 distclean". Any ideas?
+
+------- Additional Comments From cgustin ibelgique com  2003-03-17 05:49 -------
+While adding examples to SUBDIRS, you forgot to remove it from 
+DIST_SUBDIRS !!!
+
+Also, when I tried to build gtkmm-2.2.1, I realized you had increase 
+the atk requirement to 1.2.0. Turns out atk on win32 is still at 
+1.0.3 (I think it's a bad decision from Tor Lillqvist not to upgrade 
+all gtk+ components at the same time, but we have to live with it !). 
+no big deal (I just modified my atk-1.0.pc file) but I think we 
+should have separate library requirements for win32 in the 
+configure.in. What do you think ?
+
+Apart from that, I will soon put the gtkmm-2.2.1 installer online, as 
+soon as I have decided to stick to Inno Setup as the installer 
+builder or move to NSIS (as recommended by somebody who contacted me 
+privately last week).




--__--__--

_______________________________________________
Gtkmm-forge mailing list
Gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge


End of Gtkmm-forge Digest