GNOME.org
 

[gtkmm] Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #445 - 16 msgs

Send Gtkmm-forge mailing list submissions to
	gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	gtkmm-forge-admin lists sourceforge net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gtkmm-forge digest..."


gtkmm-forge is the mailing list that receives gtkmm bug reports from bugzilla.  A daily digest is sent to gtkmm-main, to encourage people to help fixing the bugs.


Today's Topics:

   1. [Bug 113688] Changed - debian: No checkbox in TreeView for boolean fields (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   2. [Bug 113688] Changed - debian: No checkbox in TreeView for boolean fields (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   3. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   4. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   5. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   6. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   7. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   8. [Bug 91404] Changed - Gtk::Button: memory leak when using mnemonic=true. (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   9. [Bug 91404] Changed - Gtk::Button: memory leak when using mnemonic=true. (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  10. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  11. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  12. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  13. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  14. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  15. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  16. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)

--__--__--

Message: 1
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, zsdebre telant tvnet hu
Cc: 
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 02:57:38 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 113688] Changed - debian: No checkbox in TreeView for boolean fields

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113688

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/113688	Tue Jun 24 17:26:01 2003
+++ shadow/113688.tmp.4300	Wed Jun 25 02:57:38 2003
@@ -125,6 +125,9 @@
 on debian.  
 
 ------- Additional Comments From zsdebre telant tvnet hu  2003-06-24 17:26 -------
 Yes, this --enable-maintainer-mode was new for me, as I'm new to gtkmm.
 So the checkboxes are working correctly on Debian SID, using Cedric'
 patch (g++-3.2.3). Thanks a lot!
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-25 02:57 -------
+OK, well done guys. Cedric, please apply your patch.



--__--__--

Message: 2
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, zsdebre telant tvnet hu
Cc: 
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 03:18:17 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 113688] Changed - debian: No checkbox in TreeView for boolean fields

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113688

Changed by cgustin ibelgique com 

--- shadow/113688	Wed Jun 25 02:57:38 2003
+++ shadow/113688.tmp.13939	Wed Jun 25 03:18:17 2003
@@ -128,6 +128,10 @@
 Yes, this --enable-maintainer-mode was new for me, as I'm new to gtkmm.
 So the checkboxes are working correctly on Debian SID, using Cedric'
 patch (g++-3.2.3). Thanks a lot!
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-25 02:57 -------
 OK, well done guys. Cedric, please apply your patch.
+
+------- Additional Comments From cgustin ibelgique com  2003-06-25 03:18 -------
+Seems you already applied the patch to both branches on 2003-06-14.
+I guess we can change the status of this bug to resolved.



--__--__--

Message: 3
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: 
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 03:24:24 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/114568	Tue Jun 24 14:48:21 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.16002	Wed Jun 25 03:24:24 2003
@@ -1092,6 +1092,17 @@
   ** (main:26364): WARNING **: Data of GtkVBox: refcount: 3
   gtk_container_destroy: GtkVBox
   gtk_widget_real_destroy: GtkVBox
   gtk_object_real_destroy: GtkVBox
 
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-25 03:24 -------
+OK, so my previous suggestion still seems to be relevant:
+"Maybe the destroy_notify is called when the GtkVBox widget is about 
+to be destroyed. (There is a 2-stage destroy process in GTK+). And 
+maybe it never actually gets destroyed because something stops the 
+destroy process. I would investigate any destroy callbacks in GTK+ 
+for GtkVBox or its base "classes". I would throw a few debug 
+statements in there."
+As an extra hint, I think that 2nd stage is called "dispose".
+



--__--__--

Message: 4
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: murrayc usa net
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 04:06:20 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by harald bugzilla gnome org hopfes de 

--- shadow/114568	Wed Jun 25 03:24:24 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.318	Wed Jun 25 04:06:20 2003
@@ -1103,6 +1103,11 @@
 maybe it never actually gets destroyed because something stops the 
 destroy process. I would investigate any destroy callbacks in GTK+ 
 for GtkVBox or its base "classes". I would throw a few debug 
 statements in there."
 As an extra hint, I think that 2nd stage is called "dispose".
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From harald bugzilla gnome org hopfes de  2003-06-25 04:06 -------
+Murry: Did you ever have the case before that the notify didn't get 
+called? I mean in a previous bug. If so, what was that reason 
+before? 



--__--__--

Message: 5
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: 
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 04:31:29 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/114568	Wed Jun 25 04:06:20 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.11566	Wed Jun 25 04:31:29 2003
@@ -1108,6 +1108,11 @@
 
 
 ------- Additional Comments From harald bugzilla gnome org hopfes de  2003-06-25 04:06 -------
 Murry: Did you ever have the case before that the notify didn't get 
 called? I mean in a previous bug. If so, what was that reason 
 before? 
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-25 04:31 -------
+Hmm, I think this bugs had that problem:
+http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111084
+



--__--__--

Message: 6
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: murrayc usa net
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 05:13:46 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by harald bugzilla gnome org hopfes de 

--- shadow/114568	Wed Jun 25 04:31:29 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.29187	Wed Jun 25 05:13:46 2003
@@ -1113,6 +1113,10 @@
 before? 
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-25 04:31 -------
 Hmm, I think this bugs had that problem:
 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111084
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From harald bugzilla gnome org hopfes de  2003-06-25 05:13 -------
+I found another maybe relevant bug 
+http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91404 



--__--__--

Message: 7
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: murrayc usa net
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 05:50:49 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by harald bugzilla gnome org hopfes de 

--- shadow/114568	Wed Jun 25 05:13:46 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.15373	Wed Jun 25 05:50:49 2003
@@ -1117,6 +1117,22 @@
 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111084
 
 
 ------- Additional Comments From harald bugzilla gnome org hopfes de  2003-06-25 05:13 -------
 I found another maybe relevant bug 
 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91404 
+
+------- Additional Comments From harald bugzilla gnome org hopfes de  2003-06-25 05:50 -------
+I am not at my desk, so I can't do any debugging yet, but....
+
+Inside the method
+
+  Container_Class::destroy_callback(GtkObject* self)
+
+I see the following statement
+
+  if(cppChild && !cppChild->is_managed_())
+
+And in my previous comments I was showing that the GTk::VBox is
+managed object of the (Singleton?)Gtk::VBox_Class
+
+Might that be a problem?



--__--__--

Message: 8
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, szombath bifab de
Cc: 
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 05:59:09 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 91404] Changed - Gtk::Button: memory leak when using mnemonic=true.

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91404

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/91404	Sun Sep 15 12:45:04 2002
+++ shadow/91404.tmp.18991	Wed Jun 25 05:59:09 2003
@@ -83,6 +83,16 @@
 	properly. gtk_widget_destroy() will always succeed, but
 	gtk_container_remove() isn't guarranteed to cause destruction.
 	It is now clear that this callback was necessary, not just as a
 	refcount hack - we really do need to remove non-manage()ed
 	widgets, because SINKing them does not prevent them from being
 	destroyed in gtk_container_destroy().
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-25 05:59 -------
+I don't think so. The whole point of that code is explained in the 
+comment at the start of the method:
+// We need to remove non-manage()ed widgets to prevent 
+gtk_container_destroy() from destroying them.
+// Contary to what we thought once, even non-floating (sunk) widgets 
+are destroyed by gtk_container_destroy()
+
+It should have no effect on manage()s widgets.



--__--__--

Message: 9
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, szombath bifab de
Cc: 
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 05:59:35 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 91404] Changed - Gtk::Button: memory leak when using mnemonic=true.

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91404

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/91404	Wed Jun 25 05:59:09 2003
+++ shadow/91404.tmp.19057	Wed Jun 25 05:59:35 2003
@@ -93,6 +93,9 @@
 // We need to remove non-manage()ed widgets to prevent 
 gtk_container_destroy() from destroying them.
 // Contary to what we thought once, even non-floating (sunk) widgets 
 are destroyed by gtk_container_destroy()
 
 It should have no effect on manage()s widgets.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-25 05:59 -------
+Sorry, ignore that. Wrong bug.



--__--__--

Message: 10
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: 
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 06:00:05 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/114568	Wed Jun 25 05:50:49 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.19580	Wed Jun 25 06:00:05 2003
@@ -1133,6 +1133,16 @@
   if(cppChild && !cppChild->is_managed_())
 
 And in my previous comments I was showing that the GTk::VBox is
 managed object of the (Singleton?)Gtk::VBox_Class
 
 Might that be a problem?
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-25 06:00 -------
+I don't think so. The whole point of that code is explained in the 
+comment at the start of the method:
+// We need to remove non-manage()ed widgets to prevent 
+gtk_container_destroy() from destroying them.
+// Contary to what we thought once, even non-floating (sunk) widgets 
+are destroyed by gtk_container_destroy()
+
+It should have no effect on manage()ed widgets



--__--__--

Message: 11
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: murrayc usa net
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 12:23:50 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net 

--- shadow/114568	Wed Jun 25 06:00:05 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.10175	Wed Jun 25 12:23:50 2003
@@ -1143,6 +1143,21 @@
 // We need to remove non-manage()ed widgets to prevent 
 gtk_container_destroy() from destroying them.
 // Contary to what we thought once, even non-floating (sunk) widgets 
 are destroyed by gtk_container_destroy()
 
 It should have no effect on manage()ed widgets
+
+------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-25 12:23 -------
+Here is the updated oder of events:
+(including the "dispose")
+
+  gtk_widget_destroy: GtkVBox
+  gtk_object_destroy: GtkVBox
+  gtk_object_dispose: GtkVBox
+  gtk_object_dispose: GtkVBox calling gtk_signal_emit
+  ** (main:26364): WARNING **: on_vbox_destroyed
+  ** (main:26364): WARNING **: Data of GtkVBox: refcount: 3
+  gtk_container_destroy: GtkVBox
+  gtk_widget_real_destroy: GtkVBox
+  gtk_object_real_destroy: GtkVBox
+



--__--__--

Message: 12
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: murrayc usa net
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 12:37:01 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net 

--- shadow/114568	Wed Jun 25 12:23:50 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.15621	Wed Jun 25 12:37:01 2003
@@ -1158,6 +1158,11 @@
   ** (main:26364): WARNING **: on_vbox_destroyed
   ** (main:26364): WARNING **: Data of GtkVBox: refcount: 3
   gtk_container_destroy: GtkVBox
   gtk_widget_real_destroy: GtkVBox
   gtk_object_real_destroy: GtkVBox
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-25 12:37 -------
+Created an attachment (id=17759)
+g_object_qdata_out.txt
+



--__--__--

Message: 13
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: 
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 13:11:54 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/114568	Wed Jun 25 12:58:16 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.30497	Wed Jun 25 13:11:54 2003
@@ -1211,6 +1211,19 @@
 
   g_signal_connect(G_OBJECT(vbo), "destroy",
 		   G_CALLBACK(on_vbox_destroyed), 0);
 
 as this one is really called by the "gtk_object_dispose"
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-25 13:11 -------
+You have done a lot of good work here and it will help me to find the
+bug. Well done and thank you. I'll try to find some time this evening.
+
+Yes, deleting a C++ instance that has no underlying C instance should
+work, but I've never tried it because it should never be possible.
+
+Well, if you delete it now then it will be double-delete when I fix
+the bug. I'm interested, in what kind of application is the occasional
+leak based on GUI interaction such a critical problem?
+
+re. dispose: Maybe. I will investigate. It has worked so far elsewhere.



--__--__--

Message: 14
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: murrayc usa net
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 12:49:01 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net 

--- shadow/114568	Wed Jun 25 12:37:01 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.20729	Wed Jun 25 12:49:00 2003
@@ -1163,6 +1163,27 @@
 
 
 ------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-25 12:37 -------
 Created an attachment (id=17759)
 g_object_qdata_out.txt
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-25 12:48 -------
+I find the place where the signals for
+
+  g_signal_connect(G_OBJECT(vbo), "destroy",
+                   G_CALLBACK(on_vbox_destroyed), 0);
+
+of my test program is emitted, but I have no clue
+where the signal (?? is it one) for
+
+  g_object_set_qdata_full(object, Glib::quark_, this,
+                          &destroy_notify_callback_);
+
+is emitted?
+
+Somewhere should be a g_object_get_qdata(Glib::quark_) and some lines 
+later a function call to the return value of g_object_get_qdata
+
+But as Glib::quark_ is only defined inside GTKMM how should it be 
+possible that the callback is triggered from GTK+?
+



--__--__--

Message: 15
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: murrayc usa net
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 12:51:53 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net 

--- shadow/114568	Wed Jun 25 12:49:00 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.22120	Wed Jun 25 12:51:53 2003
@@ -1184,6 +1184,16 @@
 Somewhere should be a g_object_get_qdata(Glib::quark_) and some lines 
 later a function call to the return value of g_object_get_qdata
 
 But as Glib::quark_ is only defined inside GTKMM how should it be 
 possible that the callback is triggered from GTK+?
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-25 12:51 -------
+What happens if I explicitly delete the Gtk::VBox wrapper of the 
+GtkVBox if the GtkVBox is already deleted?
+
+Should work, shouldn't it?
+
+I am not so deep into the GTKMM or GTK+ stuff that I will be able to 
+find the bug, so I think it is better if I delete the Gtk::VBox 
+myself.



--__--__--

Message: 16
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: murrayc usa net
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 12:58:16 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net 

--- shadow/114568	Wed Jun 25 12:51:53 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.24796	Wed Jun 25 12:58:16 2003
@@ -1194,6 +1194,23 @@
 
 Should work, shouldn't it?
 
 I am not so deep into the GTKMM or GTK+ stuff that I will be able to 
 find the bug, so I think it is better if I delete the Gtk::VBox 
 myself.
+
+------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-25 12:58 -------
+Just a last thought:
+Maybe
+
+  g_object_set_qdata_full(object,
+                          Glib::quark_,
+                          this, &destroy_notify_callback_);
+  inside ObjectBase::_set_current_wrapper
+
+should be replaced with 
+
+  g_signal_connect(G_OBJECT(vbo), "destroy",
+		   G_CALLBACK(on_vbox_destroyed), 0);
+
+as this one is really called by the "gtk_object_dispose"
+




--__--__--

_______________________________________________
Gtkmm-forge mailing list
Gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge


End of Gtkmm-forge Digest
[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]