Re: [gtkmm] sigc++2 transition?



Martin Schulze <martin-ml hippogriff de> writes:

> Am 2003.06.22 15:18 schrieb(en) Andreas Rottmann:
>> Hi!
>> I wonder what the plans about the sigc++2 transition of glibmm/gtkmm
>> are and what issues in sigc++2 still must be fixed before we can
>> start...
>
> The most important "issues in sigc++2":
> - improve and complete documentation
> - decide whether to keep some things in namespace sigc::functor or move
>    everything (apart from internals) to namespace sigc.
>
> Apart from that, I think the TODO file in cvs is still up to date ...
>
OK, I'm looking into the Makefile issue section...

Andy
-- 
Andreas Rottmann         | Rotty ICQ      | 118634484 ICQ | a rottmann gmx at
http://www.8ung.at/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://www.8ung.at/rotty/gpg.asc
Fingerprint              | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219  F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62

Make free software, not war!



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]