GNOME.org
 

[gtkmm] Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #243 - 6 msgs

Send Gtkmm-forge mailing list submissions to
	gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	gtkmm-forge-admin lists sourceforge net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gtkmm-forge digest..."


gtkmm-forge is the mailing list that receives gtkmm bug reports from bugzilla.  A daily digest is sent to gtkmm-main, to encourage people to help fixing the bugs.


Today's Topics:

   1. [Bug 94705] New - Can't compile libgnomeuimm 1.3.10 (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   2. [Bug 94110] Changed - proposed API additions to Glib::TimeVal (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   3. [Bug 94705] Changed - Can't compile libgnomeuimm 1.3.10 (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   4. [Bug 91410] Changed - Gtk::Menu: non-top-level top-level window. (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   5. [Bug 91410] Changed - Gtk::Menu: non-top-level top-level window. (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   6. [Bug 91410] Changed - Gtk::Menu: non-top-level top-level window. (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)

--__--__--

Message: 1
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Wed,  2 Oct 2002 13:33:14 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 94705] New - Can't compile libgnomeuimm 1.3.10

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94705

Changed by btb debian org 

--- shadow/94705	Wed Oct  2 13:33:14 2002
+++ shadow/94705.tmp.30251	Wed Oct  2 13:33:14 2002
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+Bug#: 94705
+Product: gtkmm
+Version: 2.0
+OS: Windows
+OS Details: 
+Status: NEW   
+Resolution: 
+Severity: major
+Priority: Normal
+Component: build
+AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
+ReportedBy: btb debian org               
+TargetMilestone: ---
+URL: 
+Summary: Can't compile libgnomeuimm 1.3.10
+
+Makefile.in's of libgnomeuimm are expecting all gtkmm packages to be part
+of same subdir.  Solution is to remove references to files not in the
+libgnomeuimm package and rerun automake and friends (autoreconf).



--__--__--

Message: 2
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, puchs ap univie ac at
Cc: 
Date: Wed,  2 Oct 2002 13:34:35 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 94110] Changed - proposed API additions to Glib::TimeVal

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94110

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/94110	Wed Oct  2 08:05:12 2002
+++ shadow/94110.tmp.30647	Wed Oct  2 13:34:35 2002
@@ -86,6 +86,15 @@
 conversion operator to double. As you can see in my first posting, I
 was pretty much aware, that not everybody might like this approach. I
 would rather call the member function "to_double", but I don't have
 time right now to look through the name convention for conversion
 member functions in glibmm and gtkmm. Do you want an updated patch? If
 yes, is "get_total_seconds()" the preferred name?
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-10-02 13:34 -------
+get_total_seconds() seems better than to_double() because the double
+is expressed in the return type, but to_double() doesn't describe what
+the number actually is - hours/minutes/seconds? If get_total_seconds()
+makes sense to you then let's use it. I haven't looked that the patch
+properly.
+
+Yes, an updated patch is necessary. Thanks.



--__--__--

Message: 3
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Wed,  2 Oct 2002 13:36:52 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 94705] Changed - Can't compile libgnomeuimm 1.3.10

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94705

Changed by btb debian org 

--- shadow/94705	Wed Oct  2 13:33:14 2002
+++ shadow/94705.tmp.31350	Wed Oct  2 13:36:52 2002
@@ -14,6 +14,11 @@
 URL: 
 Summary: Can't compile libgnomeuimm 1.3.10
 
 Makefile.in's of libgnomeuimm are expecting all gtkmm packages to be part
 of same subdir.  Solution is to remove references to files not in the
 libgnomeuimm package and rerun automake and friends (autoreconf).
+
+------- Additional Comments From btb debian org  2002-10-02 13:36 -------
+Created an attachment (id=11360)
+remove references to makefile fragments not present in libgnomeuimm tarball
+



--__--__--

Message: 4
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, szombath bifab de
Cc: 
Date: Wed,  2 Oct 2002 13:37:50 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 91410] Changed - Gtk::Menu: non-top-level top-level window.

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91410

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/91410	Fri Sep 27 03:41:35 2002
+++ shadow/91410.tmp.31592	Wed Oct  2 13:37:50 2002
@@ -9,13 +9,13 @@
 Priority: Normal
 Component: general
 AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
 ReportedBy: szombath bifab de               
 TargetMilestone: ---
 URL: 
-Summary: Gtk::Menu: possible memory leak.
+Summary: Gtk::Menu: non-top-level top-level window.
 
 Detected by purify, we think that Gtk::Menu objects are not properly
 registered. It occurs as a GtkWindow.
 
 As an aftereffect we see for instance that Gtk::Window::list_toplevels
 produces a memory leak with Gtk::Menu objects, because
@@ -157,6 +157,17 @@
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-09-23 06:50 -------
 Please respond.
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-09-27 03:41 -------
 Please respond.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-10-02 13:37 -------
+These examples don't prove any memory leak. And purify isn't avaiable
+for us to use. Maybe you could play with valgrind instead.
+
+But there is the question of why list_top_levels() is returning a
+non-top-level window.
+
+I have added 2 new test cases - test_gtk.c and test_gtkmm.cc. They do
+the same thing, with GTK+ and gtkmm. The gtkmm one returns false from
+is_top_level(). That's the problem that we need to solve first.



--__--__--

Message: 5
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, szombath bifab de
Cc: 
Date: Wed,  2 Oct 2002 13:40:17 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 91410] Changed - Gtk::Menu: non-top-level top-level window.

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91410

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/91410	Wed Oct  2 13:37:50 2002
+++ shadow/91410.tmp.32429	Wed Oct  2 13:40:17 2002
@@ -168,6 +168,11 @@
 But there is the question of why list_top_levels() is returning a
 non-top-level window.
 
 I have added 2 new test cases - test_gtk.c and test_gtkmm.cc. They do
 the same thing, with GTK+ and gtkmm. The gtkmm one returns false from
 is_top_level(). That's the problem that we need to solve first.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-10-02 13:40 -------
+Created an attachment (id=11361)
+test_gtk.c
+



--__--__--

Message: 6
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, szombath bifab de
Cc: 
Date: Wed,  2 Oct 2002 13:41:13 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 91410] Changed - Gtk::Menu: non-top-level top-level window.

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91410

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/91410	Wed Oct  2 13:40:17 2002
+++ shadow/91410.tmp.32702	Wed Oct  2 13:41:13 2002
@@ -173,6 +173,11 @@
 is_top_level(). That's the problem that we need to solve first.
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-10-02 13:40 -------
 Created an attachment (id=11361)
 test_gtk.c
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-10-02 13:41 -------
+Created an attachment (id=11362)
+test_gtkmm.cc
+




--__--__--

_______________________________________________
Gtkmm-forge mailing list
Gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge


End of Gtkmm-forge Digest
[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]