Re: [gtkmm] Re: [sigc] Building libsigc++ under Win32 for use with Intel C++ Compiler 6.0
- From: Cedric Gustin <cgustin ibelgique com>
- To: Naofumi Yasufuku <naofumi yasufuku net>
- Cc: gtkmm-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [gtkmm] Re: [sigc] Building libsigc++ under Win32 for use with Intel C++ Compiler 6.0
- Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 10:17:56 +0100
At 05:49 PM 11/6/2002 +0900, Naofumi Yasufuku wrote:
At Wed, 06 Nov 2002 08:23:10 +0100,
Cedric Gustin wrote:
>
> At 07:47 AM 11/6/2002 +0000, Dirk Gerrits wrote:
>
> >Someone replied to my gtkmm-list post privately (not sure if he wants to
> >remain anonymous) saying that the libraries should be compatible with
MSVC
> >and Intel if they are compiled using -mms-bitfields with GCC/MinGW.
>
> -mms-bitfields (the old -fnative-struct) makes the gtk+-2.0 library
Cedric, I would suggest that you should submit a patch for the latest
mingw (gcc 3.2).
For example, the following patch against gtkmm-2.0.0 is based on the
latest gtk's configure.in. It is not tested yet, but I think it works
with mingw 2.0.
Great ! But beside this -mms-bitfields difference, gtkmm does not currently
compile out of the box with gcc-3.2. There are a few #define related
problems (as reported previously on this mailing list) in thread.h and
entry.h among others. I compiled gtkmm-2.0.0 yesterday and I'm working on a
patch against the current cvs (I will merge it with yours). I have just
submitted an equivalent gcc-3.2 patch for libsigc++ about an hour ago.
Cedric
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]