[gtkmm] Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #164 - 5 msgs

[gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net]

Send Gtkmm-forge mailing list submissions to
	gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	gtkmm-forge-admin lists sourceforge net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gtkmm-forge digest..."


gtkmm-forge is the mailing list that receives gtkmm bug reports from bugzilla.  A daily digest is sent to gtkmm-main, to encourage people to help fixing the bugs.


Today's Topics:

   1. [Bug 88630] Changed - Possibly a bug with menus (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   2. [Bug 88556] Changed - pack_start and AttachOptions is still confusing (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   3. [Bug 88631] New - Simple g++3.1 fix (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   4. [Bug 88631] Changed - Simple g++3.1 fix (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   5. [Bug 88610] Changed - Need nice hierarchy picture (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)

--__--__--

Message: 1
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 13:17:28 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 88630] Changed - Possibly a bug with menus

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88630

Changed by madmaxer poczta fm 

--- shadow/88630	Fri Jul 19 13:12:39 2002
+++ shadow/88630.tmp.4463	Fri Jul 19 13:17:28 2002
@@ -32,6 +32,11 @@
 any button.
 Such behaviour is a little strange. I think either all items should be
 activated with any button, or all with only one button.
 If it is not Gtkmm problem then I'm really sorry for trouble. I created a
 simple example showing this problem. It would be very useful if someone
 rewrote it in Gtk+ and test it then.
+
+------- Additional Comments From madmaxer poczta fm  2002-07-19 13:17 -------
+Created an attachment (id=9970)
+Example for above bug
+



--__--__--

Message: 2
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 13:22:37 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 88556] Changed - pack_start and AttachOptions is still confusing

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88556

Changed by mbabcock la creatureshop henson com 

--- shadow/88556	Fri Jul 19 12:03:14 2002
+++ shadow/88556.tmp.5216	Fri Jul 19 13:22:37 2002
@@ -50,6 +50,34 @@
 	confusion with other enum values.
 	* Looked at Table::attach() and Paned::pack*() and decided that
 	they should continue to use the separate AttachOptions enum -
 	for Table that is not even a change from GTK+.
 	* Added back the bool, bool pack methods so that it's easier to 
 	port from gtkmm 1.2, or from GTK+.
+
+------- Additional Comments From mbabcock la creatureshop henson com  2002-07-19 13:22 -------
+Thanks. I didn't look at the C packbox. I just translated the
+AttachOptions arguments like so:
+
+SHRINK -> CONTRACT
+FILL -> CONTRACT
+EXPAND -> EXPAND_PADDING
+EXPAND|FILL -> EXPAND_WIDGET
+
+As the Gtk documentation says, fill without expand has no effect and
+is equivalent to CONTRACT. I think the fact that it has been used in
+code, even in Gtk examples, shows that people have trouble with these
+functions. We think the exceptions are when something external affects
+the size, such as another row in a Table or maybe if the homogenous
+flag is set, in which case EXPAND_PADDING or EXPAND_WIDGET indicates
+the fill setting.
+
+The text on the buttons in the packbox example is still the C
+booleans, translated from PackOptions using the same logic as the Box
+class uses. Should I change this to display the C++ API?
+
+If you prefix the options with PACK, is it worth the time to change
+CONTRACT back to SHRINK, or did you already do this? It would be more
+consistent.
+
+I agree that adding back the bool,bool pack methods is a good idea.
+



--__--__--

Message: 3
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 13:32:29 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 88631] New - Simple g++3.1 fix

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88631

Changed by madmaxer poczta fm 

--- shadow/88631	Fri Jul 19 13:32:29 2002
+++ shadow/88631.tmp.6713	Fri Jul 19 13:32:29 2002
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+Bug#: 88631
+Product: gtkmm
+Version: 2.0
+OS: Linux
+OS Details: 
+Status: NEW   
+Resolution: 
+Severity: normal
+Priority: Normal
+Component: build
+AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
+ReportedBy: madmaxer poczta fm               
+TargetMilestone: ---
+URL: 
+Summary: Simple g++3.1 fix
+
+As in summary...



--__--__--

Message: 4
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 13:33:07 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 88631] Changed - Simple g++3.1 fix

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88631

Changed by madmaxer poczta fm 

--- shadow/88631	Fri Jul 19 13:32:29 2002
+++ shadow/88631.tmp.6830	Fri Jul 19 13:33:07 2002
@@ -12,6 +12,11 @@
 ReportedBy: madmaxer poczta fm               
 TargetMilestone: ---
 URL: 
 Summary: Simple g++3.1 fix
 
 As in summary...
+
+------- Additional Comments From madmaxer poczta fm  2002-07-19 13:33 -------
+Created an attachment (id=9971)
+patch (btw, this bug is in 1.3.18 release)
+



--__--__--

Message: 5
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, murrayc usa net
Cc: 
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 14:37:30 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 88610] Changed - Need nice hierarchy picture

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88610

Changed by mmagallo debian org 

--- shadow/88610	Fri Jul 19 07:30:40 2002
+++ shadow/88610.tmp.16905	Fri Jul 19 14:37:30 2002
@@ -17,6 +17,10 @@
 
 I'd like someone to draw a nice graph/picture of the gtkmm widget
 hierarchy. The doxygen-generated hierarchy graph is a bit wacky.
 
 You could start with just the Gtk:: widgets. Ideally you would do this in
 an editable format, such as Dia, but I'm no expert on linux drawing programs.
+
+------- Additional Comments From mmagallo debian org  2002-07-19 14:37 -------
+Just to understand what you want, what's wacky about doxygen's class
+diagrams?




--__--__--

_______________________________________________
Gtkmm-forge mailing list
Gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge


End of Gtkmm-forge Digest