Re: [gtkmm] Problem compiling libglademm 1.3.0

[Pierre <pierre epinetworx com>]

On 2002.07.09 20:09 Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> >> Murray Cumming <murrayc usa net> writes:
>
>  > > > g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../libglade
>  > > > -I/usr/local/include/gtkmm-2.0
> -I/usr/local/lib/gtkmm-2.0/include
>  > > > -I/usr/local/include/gtk-2.0
> -I/usr/local/lib/sigc++-1.2/include
>  > > > -I/usr/local/include/sigc++-1.2 -I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0
>  > > > -I/usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include
> -I/usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/include
>  > > > -I/usr/local/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/X11R6/include
>  > > > -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/freetype2
>        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>  > > > -I/usr/local/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/local/include/libglade-2.0
>  > > > -I/usr/local/include/libxml2    -O3 -march=i686  -O3
> -march=i686 -c
>  > > > generate_defs_libglade.cc
>  > > > cc1plus: warning: changing search order for system directory
>  > > > "/usr/local/include"
>  > > > cc1plus: warning:   as it has already been specified as a
> non-system
>  > > > directory
>
>  Pierre, it'd be useful if you specify your compiler version (and
> Linux distribution if this is Linux).

GNU/Linux Slackware and gcc 3.1


>  > This is quite unusual. I would not expect us to have this problem
>  > with pkg-config. Could you tell us about your system? If this is a
>  > home-grown non-standard distribution then I don't care about it.
>
>  IIRC there's a gcc release out there which has this problem.
> Basically
>  cpp doesn't like the idea of having /usr/local/include specified
> twice,
>  because the first time it's been specified as a compiler include
>  directory.  But anyway, this is a warning, it shouldn't matter.  You
>  just should keep in mind that /usr/local/include is being searched
>  before other -I's in the command line.
>
>  I'd examine the contents of /usr/local/include more closely.  Perhaps
>  there's a /usr/local/include/gtk or something like that which is
>  getting in the way.

The problem is not the warnings, but there is a compilation error
if you look at my first email.


Pierre.