RE: [gtkmm] gtkmm- Version 1.2.10 Question

[Murray Cumming <murrayc usa net>]

On Mon, 2002-08-19 at 12:18, Ann-Marie Evans wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification.  Based on that description it seems my
> best bet is to go with the gtkmm2 version 1.3.20 then.  Yes?

I don't know. You need to give us more details of what you need. And I
don't know much about the glibmm threads stuff. 

Unless you have already asked about threading APIs in a more general C++
forum then this might not be the best place to ask.

In terms of gtkmm, yes, gtkmm2 is better than gtkmm 1.2.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Murray Cumming [mailto:murrayc usa net] 
> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 6:38 AM
> To: AnnMarie Evans mv com
> Cc: gtkmm-main
> Subject: RE: [gtkmm] gtkmm- Version 1.2.10 Question
> 
> On Mon, 2002-08-19 at 11:34, Ann-Marie Evans wrote:
> > Ooh good question.  By stable, I guess I mean something that has the
> > functionality I am looking for (threads) that won't blow up on me.
> > When looking into gtkmm2 and gnomemm2, the word unstable was used.
> > Since I am new to all this it left me concerned.  As you know, in the
> > Microsoft world, the word unstable suggests disaster.
> 
> In this context "unstable" refers to the API, not the implementation. It
> means that the API (interface) might change.
> 
> Unlike libraries, applications don't normally have APIs, so "unstable"
> in the context of applications generally means that it's likely to
> crash.
> 
> -- 
> Murray Cumming
> murrayc usa net
> www.murrayc.com
> 
> 
> 
-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc usa net
www.murrayc.com