GNOME.org
 

[gtkmm] Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #183 - 15 msgs

Send Gtkmm-forge mailing list submissions to
	gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	gtkmm-forge-admin lists sourceforge net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gtkmm-forge digest..."


gtkmm-forge is the mailing list that receives gtkmm bug reports from bugzilla.  A daily digest is sent to gtkmm-main, to encourage people to help fixing the bugs.


Today's Topics:

   1. [Bug 90033] Changed - Crashes when doing anything (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   2. [Bug 81422] Changed - Menu bar isn't shown correctly in latest gtkmm CVS (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   3. [Bug 90046] New - An object of type 'gtkmm__[XYZ]' was created directly via g_object_new(). (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   4. [Bug 90048] New - example 'basic' doesn't compile in current cvs (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   5. [Bug 90048] Changed - example 'basic' doesn't compile in current cvs (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   6. [Bug 90088] New - object reference management (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   7. [Bug 90088] Changed - object reference management (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   8. [Bug 90095] New - Errors to stderr when running libglademm/examples/variablesmap (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   9. [Bug 90095] Changed - Errors to stderr when running libglademm/examples/variablesmap (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  10. [Bug 89951] Changed - gtkmm cvs doesn't compile with gcc 2.95.3 due to internal compiler error (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  11. [Bug 90126] New - Layout disturbances with gtkmm-1.3.19 (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  12. [Bug 90127] New - Bug in example 'rulers' and wrong enum names in Gtk::Ruler's ref doc (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  13. [Bug 90127] Changed - Bug in example 'rulers' and wrong enum names in Gtk::Ruler's ref doc (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  14. [Bug 90126] Changed - Layout disturbances with gtkmm-1.3.19 (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  15. [Bug 90126] Changed - Layout disturbances with gtkmm-1.3.19 (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)

--__--__--

Message: 1
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, arne 123soft de
Cc: 
Date: Tue,  6 Aug 2002 15:09:24 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 90033] Changed - Crashes when doing anything

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90033

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/90033	Tue Aug  6 15:03:53 2002
+++ shadow/90033.tmp.10056	Tue Aug  6 15:09:24 2002
@@ -20,6 +20,40 @@
 with SIGSEGV or SIGILL, trying to execute stack contents.
 
 ------- Additional Comments From arne 123soft de  2002-08-06 14:49 -------
 Created an attachment (id=10307)
 Problem Details (lib versions, stacktrace etc.)
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-08-06 15:09 -------
+You said:
+-
+I compiled all libs that involve C++ code with GCC 3.0.1, including gtkmm.
+	The rest were built with GCC 2.95.3. Linking 3.0.1 stuff with 2.95.3 C
+libraries
+	is no problem, but 3.0.1 C++ code cannot be linked against 2.95.3 C++
+libraries
+	because of different name mangling. This however results in link-time
+errors,
+	not run-time errors. It's actually important for me to use GCC 3.0 or
+higher,
+	because the programs I'm planning to use gtkmm with contain constructs that
+	earlier GCC versions do not support.
+-
+Some simple tests with the GCC 3.0.1 version of SigC++ worked
+	(I modified the "hello_world" and "signals" examples to work with
+sigc++-1.2;
+	the official tests are also not yet suitable for sigc++-1.2 and I
+didn't use
+	them)
+
+
+I'm not 100% convinced that there's no ABI breakage with C libraries
+with different compilers. By the way, it's not name mangling that's
+the only problem with different C++ compilers.
+I don't understand what you mean about libsigc++. You changed the
+libsigc++ 1.2 examples to work with libsigc++ 1.0?
+
+Please try rebuilding the latest tarballs of libsigc++ 1.2 and gtkmm 1.3.
+
+
+



--__--__--

Message: 2
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Tue,  6 Aug 2002 16:36:41 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 81422] Changed - Menu bar isn't shown correctly in latest gtkmm CVS

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81422

Changed by mhl schulze t-online de 

--- shadow/81422	Wed Jul 31 08:57:45 2002
+++ shadow/81422.tmp.8029	Tue Aug  6 16:36:41 2002
@@ -84,6 +84,17 @@
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-07-29 14:38 -------
 I will close this bug unless I get a sensible example.
 
 ------- Additional Comments From MHL Schulze t-online de  2002-07-31 08:57 -------
 Then I will reopen it next week, when my exams are finally over and I
 find the time to get my system working with the newest cvs sources...
+
+------- Additional Comments From MHL Schulze t-online de  2002-08-06 16:36 -------
+Obviously the bug disappeared - whether it's due to changes in
+libglade or gtkmm I cannot say. I can't reproduce it in my app that I
+didn't touch the past weeks. To make completely sure, however, I want
+to try the example I previously attached to this bug before suggesting
+to close it.
+
+Question: How do I retrieve my first attachment? I accidently deleted
+my local copy and clicking on the attachment in bugzilla only delivers
+the names of the files in the tar archive...



--__--__--

Message: 3
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Tue,  6 Aug 2002 16:42:03 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 90046] New - An object of type 'gtkmm__[XYZ]' was created directly via g_object_new().

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90046

Changed by mhl schulze t-online de 

--- shadow/90046	Tue Aug  6 16:42:03 2002
+++ shadow/90046.tmp.8806	Tue Aug  6 16:42:03 2002
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+Bug#: 90046
+Product: gnomemm
+Version: 2.0
+OS: other
+OS Details: 
+Status: NEW   
+Resolution: 
+Severity: normal
+Priority: Normal
+Component: libglademm
+AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
+ReportedBy: MHL Schulze t-online de               
+TargetMilestone: ---
+URL: 
+Summary: An object of type 'gtkmm__[XYZ]' was created directly via g_object_new().
+
+Running any app that loads something out of an xml file with libglademm, a
+bunch of warnings is printed on stderr. E.g. the output of the example
+'basic' reads:
+
+(lt-basic:9356): glibmm-WARNING **: Glib::Object::Object(GObject*): An
+object of type 'gtkmm__GladeXML' was created directly via g_object_new().
+The Object::Object(const Glib::ConstructParams&) constructor should be used
+instead.
+This could happen if the C instance lived longer than the C++ instance, so
+that a second C++ instance was created automatically to wrap it. That would
+be a gtkmm bug that you should report.
+
+(lt-basic:9356): glibmm-WARNING **: Glib::Object::Object(GObject*): An
+object of type 'gtkmm__GtkDialog' was created directly via g_object_new().
+The Object::Object(const Glib::ConstructParams&) constructor should be used
+instead.
+This could happen if the C instance lived longer than the C++ instance, so
+that a second C++ instance was created automatically to wrap it. That would
+be a gtkmm bug that you should report.
+
+(lt-basic:9356): gtkmm-WARNING **: gtkmm: Attempt to call Gtk::manage() on
+a Gtk::Window, but a Gtk::Window has no parent container to manage its
+lifetime.
+
+(lt-basic:9356): glibmm-WARNING **: Glib::Object::Object(GObject*): An
+object of type 'gtkmm__GtkButton' was created directly via g_object_new().
+The Object::Object(const Glib::ConstructParams&) constructor should be used
+instead.
+This could happen if the C instance lived longer than the C++ instance, so
+that a second C++ instance was created automatically to wrap it. That would
+be a gtkmm bug that you should report.
+
+
+Since I'm not sure whether this is a libglademm or a gtkmm bug I'm
+reporting where the bug occurs.



--__--__--

Message: 4
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Tue,  6 Aug 2002 16:50:11 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 90048] New - example 'basic' doesn't compile in current cvs

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90048

Changed by mhl schulze t-online de 

--- shadow/90048	Tue Aug  6 16:50:11 2002
+++ shadow/90048.tmp.9981	Tue Aug  6 16:50:11 2002
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+Bug#: 90048
+Product: gnomemm
+Version: 2.0
+OS: other
+OS Details: 
+Status: NEW   
+Resolution: 
+Severity: normal
+Priority: Normal
+Component: libglademm
+AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
+ReportedBy: MHL Schulze t-online de               
+TargetMilestone: ---
+URL: 
+Summary: example 'basic' doesn't compile in current cvs
+
+Due to a bug in .../examples/basic/Makefile.am the example 'basic' doesn't
+compile in current cvs. Fix: all occurencies of 'example' have to replaced
+with 'basic' to match the actual file names. A patch in underway...



--__--__--

Message: 5
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Tue,  6 Aug 2002 16:50:36 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 90048] Changed - example 'basic' doesn't compile in current cvs

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90048

Changed by mhl schulze t-online de 

--- shadow/90048	Tue Aug  6 16:50:11 2002
+++ shadow/90048.tmp.10007	Tue Aug  6 16:50:36 2002
@@ -14,6 +14,11 @@
 URL: 
 Summary: example 'basic' doesn't compile in current cvs
 
 Due to a bug in .../examples/basic/Makefile.am the example 'basic' doesn't
 compile in current cvs. Fix: all occurencies of 'example' have to replaced
 with 'basic' to match the actual file names. A patch in underway...
+
+------- Additional Comments From MHL Schulze t-online de  2002-08-06 16:50 -------
+Created an attachment (id=10309)
+The promised patch...
+



--__--__--

Message: 6
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, Andreas Holzmann epost de
Cc: 
Date: Wed,  7 Aug 2002 04:35:54 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 90088] New - object reference management

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90088

Changed by andreas holzmann epost de 

--- shadow/90088	Wed Aug  7 04:35:54 2002
+++ shadow/90088.tmp.5889	Wed Aug  7 04:35:54 2002
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+Bug#: 90088
+Product: gtkmm
+Version: 2.0
+OS: other
+OS Details: 
+Status: NEW   
+Resolution: 
+Severity: major
+Priority: Normal
+Component: general
+AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
+ReportedBy: Andreas Holzmann epost de               
+TargetMilestone: ---
+URL: 
+Summary: object reference management
+
+Something seems to have changed in the object reference management.
+After I've changed the usage of g_object_new() to Glib::ConstructParams()
+in libgnomecanvasmm to get it working again, I noticed that canvas
+objects are not removed anymore in my application. I can reproduce the
+problem with simple Gtk Widgets (example attached). It seems that if
+I delete a manage()'ed object all is ok, but if I delete an object
+that is not managed()'ed strange things happen.
+I use manage() if I don't want to care about objects destruction,
+the container should handle this for me. But if I want control I
+don't use manage(), I call delete() myself e.g. in the destructor.
+
+In my example a label and a button is added to a window. Pressing the
+button removes the label by calling delete(). If the label is managed()'ed
+this works fine. If you use the other line in the example where the
+label is not managed()'ed pressing the button for the first time
+does nothing, the application segfaults if you press a second time.



--__--__--

Message: 7
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, Andreas Holzmann epost de
Cc: 
Date: Wed,  7 Aug 2002 04:36:55 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 90088] Changed - object reference management

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90088

Changed by andreas holzmann epost de 

--- shadow/90088	Wed Aug  7 04:35:54 2002
+++ shadow/90088.tmp.6010	Wed Aug  7 04:36:55 2002
@@ -27,6 +27,11 @@
 
 In my example a label and a button is added to a window. Pressing the
 button removes the label by calling delete(). If the label is managed()'ed
 this works fine. If you use the other line in the example where the
 label is not managed()'ed pressing the button for the first time
 does nothing, the application segfaults if you press a second time.
+
+------- Additional Comments From Andreas Holzmann epost de  2002-08-07 04:36 -------
+Created an attachment (id=10331)
+Example to reproduce the problem
+



--__--__--

Message: 8
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Wed,  7 Aug 2002 05:48:52 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 90095] New - Errors to stderr when running libglademm/examples/variablesmap

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90095

Changed by michael koziarski com 

--- shadow/90095	Wed Aug  7 05:48:51 2002
+++ shadow/90095.tmp.14591	Wed Aug  7 05:48:51 2002
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+Bug#: 90095
+Product: gnomemm
+Version: 2.0
+OS: Linux
+OS Details: RedHat 7.2 with garnome
+Status: NEW   
+Resolution: 
+Severity: normal
+Priority: Normal
+Component: libglademm
+AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
+ReportedBy: michael koziarski com               
+TargetMilestone: ---
+URL: 
+Summary: Errors to stderr when running libglademm/examples/variablesmap
+
+I've no idea what they mean, but they said 'That would be a gtkmm bug that
+you should report.'



--__--__--

Message: 9
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Wed,  7 Aug 2002 05:49:51 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 90095] Changed - Errors to stderr when running libglademm/examples/variablesmap

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90095

Changed by michael koziarski com 

--- shadow/90095	Wed Aug  7 05:48:51 2002
+++ shadow/90095.tmp.14696	Wed Aug  7 05:49:51 2002
@@ -13,6 +13,11 @@
 TargetMilestone: ---
 URL: 
 Summary: Errors to stderr when running libglademm/examples/variablesmap
 
 I've no idea what they mean, but they said 'That would be a gtkmm bug that
 you should report.'
+
+------- Additional Comments From michael koziarski com  2002-08-07 05:49 -------
+Created an attachment (id=10334)
+Log of errors on stderr
+



--__--__--

Message: 10
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Wed,  7 Aug 2002 07:20:02 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 89951] Changed - gtkmm cvs doesn't compile with gcc 2.95.3 due to internal compiler error

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89951

Changed by mhl schulze t-online de 

--- shadow/89951	Tue Aug  6 11:30:22 2002
+++ shadow/89951.tmp.4896	Wed Aug  7 07:20:02 2002
@@ -87,6 +87,54 @@
 specializations in treeview.hg, current cvs compiles smoothly with gcc
 2.95.3 (hopefully - it's not finished yet...).
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-08-06 11:30 -------
 Do try to break that function down into simpler lines so that you can
 find the real source of the problem.
+
+------- Additional Comments From MHL Schulze t-online de  2002-08-07 07:20 -------
+Well it definately is a compiler bug! Here is the most simple example
+I've found to reproduce it: Referencing the specialization of the
+templeted member function foo::doit() from within a member function of
+the same class beats gcc 2.95.3!
+
+
+struct foo {
+  template <class C> inline
+  void doit();
+
+  void thebug();
+};
+
+template <class C> inline
+void foo::doit() {
+}
+
+void notabug() {
+  void (foo::*func)();
+  func = &foo::doit<int>;
+}
+
+struct bar {
+  void neitherabug();
+};
+
+void bar::neitherabug() {
+  void (foo::*func)();
+  func = &foo::doit<int>;
+}
+
+void foo::thebug() {
+  void (foo::*func)();
+  func = &foo::doit<int>;  // line 28
+}
+
+void main() {
+}
+
+
+martin ipc-notebook:~/projects/test > g++ test.cc
+test.cc: In method `void foo::thebug()':
+test.cc:28: Internal compiler error.
+test.cc:28: Please submit a full bug report.
+test.cc:28: See <URL:http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html> for
+instructions.



--__--__--

Message: 11
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Wed,  7 Aug 2002 12:25:10 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 90126] New - Layout disturbances with gtkmm-1.3.19

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90126

Changed by szombath bifab de 

--- shadow/90126	Wed Aug  7 12:25:10 2002
+++ shadow/90126.tmp.12314	Wed Aug  7 12:25:10 2002
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+Bug#: 90126
+Product: gtkmm
+Version: 2.0
+OS: Solaris
+OS Details: 
+Status: NEW   
+Resolution: 
+Severity: normal
+Priority: Normal
+Component: build
+AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
+ReportedBy: szombath bifab de               
+TargetMilestone: ---
+URL: 
+Summary: Layout disturbances with gtkmm-1.3.19
+
+With the new release we see under Solaris/Sparc (both compiled by g++ and
+Forte C++) some layout distortions. Gtk::SHRINK does not seem to work
+anymore.
+
+This seems to be connected with the following run-time warning
+
+  (menu:21056): gtkmm-WARNING **: gtkmm: Attempt to call Gtk::manage() 
+  on a Gtk::Window, but a Gtk::Window has no parent container to manage 
+  its lifetime.
+
+which we get for instance with almost all example programs now.



--__--__--

Message: 12
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Wed,  7 Aug 2002 12:52:49 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 90127] New - Bug in example 'rulers' and wrong enum names in Gtk::Ruler's ref doc

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90127

Changed by mhl schulze t-online de 

--- shadow/90127	Wed Aug  7 12:52:49 2002
+++ shadow/90127.tmp.15475	Wed Aug  7 12:52:49 2002
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+Bug#: 90127
+Product: gtkmm
+Version: 2.0
+OS: other
+OS Details: 
+Status: NEW   
+Resolution: 
+Severity: normal
+Priority: Normal
+Component: general
+AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
+ReportedBy: MHL Schulze t-online de               
+TargetMilestone: ---
+URL: 
+Summary: Bug in example 'rulers' and wrong enum names in Gtk::Ruler's ref doc
+
+The example 'rulers' doesn't work at the moment because pointer motion
+events (on which the motion of the marker on the rulers is triggered) are
+quite rare. This is because 'Gdk::POINTER_MOTION_HINT_MASK' has been added
+to the event mask of the drawing area. Also while a mouse button is
+pressed, no motion events will be emitted unless 'Gdk::BUTTON_PRESSED_MASK'
+is added to the event mask of the drawing area. This seems strange and I'll
+report on the gtk+ ml.
+
+Gtk::Ruler's reference documentation contains gdk macro names instead of
+our enum names.



--__--__--

Message: 13
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Wed,  7 Aug 2002 12:54:13 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 90127] Changed - Bug in example 'rulers' and wrong enum names in Gtk::Ruler's ref doc

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90127

Changed by mhl schulze t-online de 

--- shadow/90127	Wed Aug  7 12:52:49 2002
+++ shadow/90127.tmp.15670	Wed Aug  7 12:54:13 2002
@@ -21,6 +21,11 @@
 pressed, no motion events will be emitted unless 'Gdk::BUTTON_PRESSED_MASK'
 is added to the event mask of the drawing area. This seems strange and I'll
 report on the gtk+ ml.
 
 Gtk::Ruler's reference documentation contains gdk macro names instead of
 our enum names.
+
+------- Additional Comments From MHL Schulze t-online de  2002-08-07 12:54 -------
+Created an attachment (id=10341)
+A patch to fix the described problems.
+



--__--__--

Message: 14
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Wed,  7 Aug 2002 14:14:48 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 90126] Changed - Layout disturbances with gtkmm-1.3.19

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90126

Changed by szombath bifab de 

--- shadow/90126	Wed Aug  7 12:25:10 2002
+++ shadow/90126.tmp.25448	Wed Aug  7 14:14:48 2002
@@ -22,6 +22,17 @@
 
   (menu:21056): gtkmm-WARNING **: gtkmm: Attempt to call Gtk::manage() 
   on a Gtk::Window, but a Gtk::Window has no parent container to manage 
   its lifetime.
 
 which we get for instance with almost all example programs now.
+
+------- Additional Comments From szombath bifab de  2002-08-07 14:14 -------
+The complete build consists of:
+
+  pkgconfig-0.12.0 
+  glib-2.0.6
+  atk-1.0.3
+  pango-1.0.4
+  gtk+-2.0.6
+  libsigc++-1.1.13
+  gtkmm-1.3.19



--__--__--

Message: 15
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, szombath bifab de
Cc: 
Date: Wed,  7 Aug 2002 14:23:57 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 90126] Changed - Layout disturbances with gtkmm-1.3.19

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90126

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/90126	Wed Aug  7 14:14:48 2002
+++ shadow/90126.tmp.26834	Wed Aug  7 14:23:57 2002
@@ -33,6 +33,13 @@
   glib-2.0.6
   atk-1.0.3
   pango-1.0.4
   gtk+-2.0.6
   libsigc++-1.1.13
   gtkmm-1.3.19
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-08-07 14:23 -------
+Which examples? They would need to be fixed.
+
+Please give us an example of the Gtk::SHRINK problem.
+
+




--__--__--

_______________________________________________
Gtkmm-forge mailing list
Gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge


End of Gtkmm-forge Digest
[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]