Re: [GtkGLExt] GtkGLExt 1.2.0 is out ...
- From: Kouhei Sutou <kou cozmixng org>
- To: gtkglext-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [GtkGLExt] GtkGLExt 1.2.0 is out ...
- Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 18:05:25 +0900 (JST)
Hi,
In <43E577C9 5070004 k-3d com>
"[GtkGLExt] GtkGLExt 1.2.0 is out ..." on Sat, 04 Feb 2006 20:58:01 -0700,
"Timothy M. Shead" <tshead k-3d com> wrote:
> ... as planned, this is just a bump in the version to "stable". Next,
> I'll be looking at a GtkGLExtMM 1.2.0 release to get in-sync.
It's a good news, but I have a question: Is the problem
reported by Braden fixed?
In <1138574260 14840 36 camel localhost localdomain>
"[GtkGLExt] Leaking GdkGLContext?" on Sun, 29 Jan 2006 17:37:40 -0500,
Braden McDaniel <braden endoframe com> wrote:
> I have an application using GtkGLExt where the GdkGLContext created in
> the call to gtk_widget_get_gl_context doesn't get destroyed. Unsure of
> the proper usage pattern, I went back to the GtkGLExt examples to see
> how they do it. I think they might have the same problem.
>
> Looking at the code in gtkglwidget.c, it looks like this GdkGLContext
> should get destroyed in response to a call to gtk_gl_widget_unrealize.
> However, when I run the "button" example, that function never seems to
> get called. valgrind notes the GdkGLContext as "possibly lost".
>
> I'm observing this in 1.0.6. (I would have checked CVS before sending
> this, but SourceForge anonymous CVS appears to be flaking out again at
> the moment.)
>
> --
> Braden McDaniel e-mail: <braden endoframe com>
> <http://endoframe.com> Jabber: <braden jabber org>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]