Re: [gtk-vnc-devel] [PATCH 5/7] Use X window backing store for the VNC window 2008-11-24 Federico Mena Quintero <federico novell com>
- From: "Hugh O. Brock" <hbrock redhat com>
- To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange redhat com>
- Cc: gtk-vnc-devel lists sourceforge net
- Subject: Re: [gtk-vnc-devel] [PATCH 5/7] Use X window backing store for the VNC window 2008-11-24 Federico Mena Quintero <federico novell com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:22:00 -0500
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 08:17:55PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:08:25AM -0600, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 19:51 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >
> > [backing store]
> > >
> > > Is this just double buffering in GTK parlance? If you avoid disabling
> > > double buffering, does that help?
> >
> > Nope, it's different. You can ask the X server to use backing store if
> > possible --- if the server can save the contents of a window, it can
> > avoid sending Expose events when the window is unobscured. That is,
> > nothing goes over the wire in the ideal case.
> >
> > [This is similar to requesting "save-unders" for temporary windows, but
> > it saves your actual contents, not the underlying contents.]
>
> Ok, I see how this can make a big difference for slow X connections.
> Obviously it'll have a bit of a memory overhead in the X server
> to maintain the backing store.
>
> ACk to the patch in principle, once its has been #ifdef'd to not hardcode
> the use of GTK X backend on all platforms.
>
> Daniel
Glad to see this going in, it will be very heplful on the oVirt cloud
setup (slow console connections will be the rule rather than the
exception).
--Hugh
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]