Re: buildable vs plain objects

On 26.09.2010 02:50, Kevin Ryde wrote:
Implementing GtkBuildable is only necessary if you want to customize
the construction, I think.

Perhaps the docs could be chopped, rather radically, to something like

Looks good to me, thanks.  Committed.

Perhaps synopsis bit could show how ADD_CHILD lets you do interesting
things with<child>  sub-objects, or in some way emphasise the good
things Buildable can do or is needed for.

That might be good, yes. The current synopsis program doesn't even need to implement the Gtk2::Buildable interface (so I removed this line).

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]