Re: g_log_set_default_handler

[Kevin Ryde <user42 zip com au>]

muppet <scott asofyet org> writes:
> My gut reaction was "we set a global default handler already", but we
> don't.

I wondered if a default handler might cover what gperl_handle_logs_for()
sets up.  Or maybe just offer gperl_log_handler() at the perl level so
you could pass it to set_default_handler() if you wanted.  Or offer
gperl_handle_logs_for() at the perl level, to do just specific domains.
But maybe that's been thought through before.

> One nit: there is no concurrency protection for
> gperl_log_default_handler_callback.

Oops, yep.  I think I've badly botched the log_func==undef case too.