Re: signal_connect bad name leak

[Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch gmx de>]

Kevin Ryde wrote:
> Giving a bad signal name to signal_connect() seems to leak some memory.
> Eg. core used by foo.pl below grows forever.
>
> I know leaks on error conditions aren't a priority, but this one is easy
> to notice.  I get some joy from inserting a g_closure_unref per below.
> (That's the right way to discard a GClosure which still has a floating
> ref, is it?)

Looks good to me.  Committed.  Thanks!