Re: Standalone Pango, take two

Sergei Steshenko wrote:
I think the safest approach is to export/map _nothing_.

If one needs method/data, he/she should explicitly prefix it with
package name.

I think you're confusing something here. We are not talking about exporting symbols into the user's namespace. Gtk2 never did that (if not asked for it), Pango will not do it, and the compatibility layer will not do it either. We are talking about creating aliases in Gtk2::Pango for the symbols in Pango.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]