Re: GtkGC shared auto-release

[Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch gmx de>]

Kevin Ryde wrote:
> > Did this patch never get applied?
> Don't think so.

I just committed muppet's patch with the "static" fix.

> I'd suggested hanging the release in the plain Gtk2::Gdk::GC
> destruction, rather than a subclass.  Not terribly encapsulated, but
> would mean a plain Gtk2::Gdk::GC the same as at the C level, instead of
> a new subclass.

What's the problem with a new subclass?  Since Gtk2::GC inherits from
Gtk2::Gdk::GC, code that expects a Gtk2::Gdk::GC should continue to work
just fine when given a Gtk2::GC.

-- 
Bye,
-Torsten