Re: problem with $liststore->set

["muppet" <scott asofyet org>]

Jens Luedicke said:
> is it a known problem that something like this
>
> $liststore->set($iter, 0, $stuff->return_value);
>
> behaves differently than
>
> $val = $stuff->return_value;
> $liststore->set($iter, 0, $val);
>
> !?

I wouldn't call it a "problem".  By perl's rules, the subroutine will be
called in list context in the first case.


> I just had a problem with the first case. The liststore complained and
> returned a warning.

What was the warning?  Something like this?

Usage: $liststore->set ($iter, column1, value1, column2, value2, ...)
   the first value in each pair must be a column number at foo.pl line 15.



-- 
muppet <scott at asofyet dot org>