Re: Glib 1.102 (stable)

On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 09:49:31PM +0100, Torsten Schoenfeld wrote:
On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 21:48 +0100, Torsten Schoenfeld wrote:

This should read

of course.

I'm getting a lot of users of perl-Glib 1.102 reporting segfaults (1.101
works fine for them.)  The following is the backtrace I've managed to gather
from one of the users:

#0  0x7f480514 in S_hv_fetch_flags ()
#1  0x7f480438 in Perl_hv_fetch ()
#2  0x004180b8 in _gperl_fetch_wrapper_key (object=0x1800200,
name=0x1bb92c0 "\001ºz\210", create=1) at GObject.xs:772
#3  0x00410ef4 in gperl_type_set_property (object=0x3bdf880,
property_id=28857897, value=0xbfffcf30, pspec=0x1af7e50) at GType.xs:1512
#4  0x0060d004 in g_object_set_property (object=0x3bdf880,
property_name=0x2976290 "\002\227X\220", value=0xbfffcfb0) at gobject.c:691
#5  0x04014e8c in gtk_tree_view_column_cell_set_cell_data
(tree_column=0x3bdf530, tree_model=0xbfffcfb0, iter=0x19569c8,
is_expander=1, is_expanded=1) at gtktreeviewcolumn.c:2547
#6  0x04001358 in validate_row (tree_view=0x3bdedf0, tree=0x3be2c50,
node=0x1b9d818, iter=0xbfffd0e0, path=0x0) at gtktreeview.c:4665
#7  0x040024f0 in do_validate_rows (tree_view=0x3bdedf0, queue_resize=0) at
#8  0x03ffc090 in gtk_tree_view_size_request (widget=0x1b9d818,
requisition=0x3be2c50) at gtktreeview.c:1806

Hope this helps,



Sean Dague                                       Mid-Hudson Valley
sean at dague dot net                            Linux Users Group                       

There is no silver bullet.  Plus, werewolves make better neighbors
than zombies, and they tend to keep the vampire population down.

Attachment: pgpxEsV4cR6iu.pgp
Description: PGP signature

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]