Re: Binding convention for poorly named functions

[James Curbo <james teyandei net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Torsten Schoenfeld wrote:
| As risky as it might be, I'd vote for keeping up the method approach
| simply for the sake of consistency.  And for changing all those bad boys
| to helper functions in Gtk3.

This gets my vote, for the same reasons. It would be utterly confusing
to newbies to have some functions as helpers and some as methods. I do
totally support splitting them out in the next major version, however.

James
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFAVe0hxMpqVQpLJj8RAnqoAJ9Tb2ge1mnW7tkv2GjPvVklC5Xq9wCfRuj3
1xI6UoWQzLougWGme/LhSCk=
=vvdH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----