Re: GUI interfaces
- From: MaRCeLO PeReiRA <gandalf_mp yahoo com br>
- To: Andrew Pimlott <gtk-perl-list andrew pimlott net>, gtk-perl-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GUI interfaces
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 12:17:23 -0300 (ART)
Hi All,
Thanks for all answers!!
I know that all libraries has its own advantages, but
I would like to know which one is:
- More portable (this is the most important item)
- Easiest to write small GUI
- Has good looking
Regards,
Marcelo
--- Andrew Pimlott <gtk-perl-list andrew pimlott net>
escreveu: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 07:38:05PM +0100,
A.
Pagaltzis wrote:
* Andrew Pimlott
<gtk-perl-list andrew pimlott net> [2004-02-20
07:44]:
I'm really surprised at this opinion. I think
Tcl is a perfect
botch, but Tk is beautiful, at least for
relatively simple
interfaces. This elegance carries over well to
Perl/Tk, even
if it is not quite as seamless as in Tcl. What
don't you like
about it?
Stuff like instatiating a button by calling a
factory method on
its container, instead of calling the button
classes constructuor
and packing it. Passing labels by reference and
changing them by
changing the referee. More stuff like this I can't
remember off
hand, which effectively all makes it really hard
to refactor bits
for generality as you go.
I suppose this is all true, and I wouldn't want to
"scale up" a Tk app.
But these features are all terribly handy when
you're just throwing
together a basic UI. At least, this is what I
remember from my
experience; I haven't used Perl/Tk in years.
Andrew
_______________________________________________
gtk-perl-list mailing list
gtk-perl-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-perl-list
______________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - O melhor e-mail do Brasil! Abra sua conta agora:
http://br.yahoo.com/info/mail.html
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]