Re: GdkRectangle, again

[Ross McFarland <rwmcfa1 neces com>]

On Tue, 2003-04-29 at 05:26, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> "muppet" <scott asofyet org> writes:

> E.g. even more readable than hash ref thing. There's also
> ->values so that you can do things like:
>
> my (undef, undef, $w, $h) = $update_rect->values;

that's a very good idea. 


the following is my implementation of gtk_tooltips_data_get which
returns a hash version of the struct that it would normally return. my
question is should we bless this hash with a Gtk2::TooltipsData moniker
for any reason? I don't know of anything that accepts a GtkTooltipsData
struct (even tooltips stuff doesn't.)

## GtkTooltipsData* gtk_tooltips_data_get (GtkWidget *widget)
void
gtk_tooltips_data_get (class, widget)
        SV        * class
        GtkWidget * widget
    PREINIT:
        GtkTooltipsData * ret = NULL;
        HV              * hv;
    PPCODE:
        ret = gtk_tooltips_data_get(widget);
        if( !ret )
                XSRETURN_UNDEF;
        hv = newHV();
        hv_store(hv, "tooltips", 8, newSVGtkTooltips(ret->tooltips),0);
        hv_store(hv, "widget", 6,
newSVGtkWidget(GTK_WIDGET(ret->widget)),0);
        hv_store(hv, "tip_text", 8, newSVpv(ret->tip_text, PL_na),0);
        hv_store(hv, "tip_private", 11, newSVpv(ret->tip_private,
PL_na),0);
        XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newRV_noinc((SV*)hv)));

-rm