Re: Glade architecture change

[Michael Torrie <torriem gmail com>]

On 03/03/2017 07:16 AM, LRN wrote:
> Does this make sense? Was this already considered during previous Glade
> rewrites? If yes, why was it discarded? Thoughts?

I'm not sure GTK+'s architecture would even allow glade to operate in a
manner like you suggest.

Besides that, Glade's instability doesn't seem to have anything to do
with how the preview process displays the actual widgets.

> P.S. This proposal was not well-received on #gtk+, so there's that.

How was it presented and why was it not well received?