Re: What to use on GTK+3
- From: Allin Cottrell <cottrell wfu edu>
- To: Tristan Van Berkom <tristan upstairslabs com>
- Cc: "gtk-list gnome org" <gtk-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: What to use on GTK+3
- Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 20:41:34 -0400 (EDT)
On Sat, 8 Aug 2015, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 3:11 AM, Igor Korot <ikorot01 gmail com> wrote:
Emmanuele,
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi gmail com> wrote:
 Use "Yes", but please: consider using a more descriptive label and icon 
than
 just "yes".
The "Yes", "No" and "Cancel" are legitimate button labels, especially if 
used
in one dialog.
In some very few cases you may find yourself with no better option 
than "yes", "no" or "cancel" as button labels in a dialog, 
however, probably 99% of the time you can do better, and you do a 
disservice to your users by choosing GTK_STOCK_OK just because you 
were too lazy to search for a proper verb which describes the 
consequent action properly.
Granted (and thanks for the interesting stackexchange reference 
infra). Giving options of just OK/Cancel seems to be generally 
suboptimal and in some cases positively evil.
However, in relation to Igor's original point, giving the user 
options of Yes/No is IMO fine if your dialog asks a short, simple 
question that requires an answer of Yes or No. As in
Overwrite <filename>? Yes/No
Send message? Yes/No
Really delete X? Yes/No
One could rephrase these messages as something other than Yes/No 
questions but would that actually be clearer? I doubt it. I'd want 
to see peer-reviewed psychological studies showing an error rate 
that was lower by a statistically significant margin before I 
believed that.
Allin Cottrell
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]   [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]   
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]