Re: gtk canvas?

[z pekar gmail com]

according to the list you've provided goocanvas and ccc are only
candidates for being the Gtk+ canvas
shouldn't one of them be taken for long term support projects?

On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 9:51 PM, Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi gmail com> wrote:
>
>  On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 19:06 +0200, Giovanni Funchal wrote:
>  > Hi,
>  >
>  > I've asked about a gtk canvas sometime ago and someone pointed me to
>  > goocanvas but it is still beta and I'm affraid of using it because it
>  > might disapear. Is there any recent progress? Will gtk ever have a
>  > standard canvas?
>
>  as I said here:
>
>   http://log.emmanuelebassi.net/archives/2008/03/berlin3/
>
>  the choice is between either to get one of the current canvases and give
>  it "the gtk+ seal of approval" or completely reimplement it inside gtk.
>
>  there are various canvases available:
>
>   http://live.gnome.org/ProjectRidley/CanvasOverview
>
>  each with its own strengths and disadvantages. if you plan on relying on
>  hardware acceleration, and you don't plan on embedding gtk+ widgets (not
>  yet, at least), the Clutter:
>
>   http://www.clutter-project.org
>
>  might be a good choice.
>
>  if you're worried about a dependency might disappear you can import it
>  straight inside your project, by the way; it's a maintenance burden, but
>  if you are actively maintaining a project then you shouldn't worry about
>  dependencies disappearing.
>
>  ciao,
>   Emmanuele.
>
>  --
>  Emmanuele Bassi,
>  W: http://www.emmanuelebassi.net
>  B: http://log.emmanuelebassi.net
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  gtk-list mailing list
>  gtk-list gnome org
>  http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
>