Re: (severe) performance issues

["Iain *" <iaingnome gmail com>]

On 4/4/07, David J. Andruczyk <djandruczyk yahoo com> wrote:
> Nope.  that tab is the ONLY one that is updating, and
> I have code in place so if that tab is NOT active, it
> doesn't even update it at ALL.  I have tested this
> VERY thoroughly..  By commenting out ONE LINE in my
> code that updates the 22 labels on that tab, cpu usage
> goes from "high" to zero.  Right now it does NOT even
> update them all.  There is logic in place to reduce
> the number of updates. (it checks based on last update
> time, the number of times it's skipped, and a "delta"
> from last value (if it changes too much it forces and
> update)
>
> I have yet to try placing the label into a GtkFixed
> yet as per another users suggestion.

I see. I STAND corrected.
MAYBE you should try as (one of the) Paul DAVIES suggested
and write a custom label that doesn't propagate the size requests.
Shouldn't be too hard.

iain