Fwd: Question on gtk library dependencies
- From: John Koshi <jkoshi yahoo com>
- To: gtk-list gnome org
- Subject: Fwd: Question on gtk library dependencies
- Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:07:05 -0700 (PDT)
Does anyone have a quick answer for this question?
--- John Koshi <jkoshi yahoo com> wrote:
> Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:44:02 -0700 (PDT)
> From: John Koshi <jkoshi yahoo com>
> Subject: Question on gtk library dependencies
> To: gtk-list gnome org
> Sorry about the long-winded explanation below, but it
> gives a clear picture about a concern I have.
> I was building a simple gtk application for ipaq h6300
> under Familiar 0.8.4 , and had to do the following:
> 1) Install gtk+-dev_2.6.7-r1_arm.ipk
> 2) Install libglib-2.0-dev_2.6.4-r0_arm.ipk
> 3) Install pango-dev_1.8.1-r2_arm.ipk
> 4) Install libatk-1.0-dev_1.9.0-r0_arm.ipk
> I had to fix some of the sym links, provide the linker
> with the library path, and then the build worked and
> tested OK.
> I later tried to install the "Roadmap" application, from
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/roadmap/ (the package is
> roadmap_1.0.12_arm.ipk). For it's dependencies, I had to
> install gpsd_2.20-r2_arm.ipk, and libgps10_2.20-r2_arm.ipk.
> The remaining dependency for Roadmap to install correctly
> is libgtk2.0-0.
> Looking at the libraries, I see libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.600.10
> is already present. Will there be a conflict if I now get
> the package libgtk2.0-0 from Familiar?
> My concern is that libgtk2.0-0 and it's several dependencies
> (ie:libgcc1, libglib2.0-0, liblango1.0-0, libatk0, etc), all
> appear to be earlier versions than what I now have installed
> on my ipaq, and I may end with a mess if I do install it.
> Thanks in advance for your help.
] [Thread Prev