RE: GTK+ and Application Delivery
- From: "Vlietstra, Joe (SSD)" <Joe Vlietstra ngc com>
- To: <gtk-list gnome org>
- Cc:
- Subject: RE: GTK+ and Application Delivery
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 13:17:21 -0700
> From: riboaz xs4all nl
> Subject: GTK+ and Application Delivery
> ...
> But my question is this: why does GTK+ not encourage itself
> to be more accessible from an application deployment point of
> view? Why is there, at least, not an explicit document
> relating to delivery and deployment issues? Why is there not
> a distinction made between development with tht
> GTK+ libraries and deployment of applications made thereof?
> Why are GTK+ there no binaries of the libraries available that
> can make this distribution easier? (For example, I need to
> deliver this on macOS and don't have a mac machine myself,
> where do I obtain the binaries to make my app distributable?)
There are binary distributions of GTK+ already available:
-- Windows (http://gladewin32.sourceforge.net)
This project provides two installers:
-- Development (includes glade, include files, etc.)
-- Runtime (for your users)
We use these installers for our applications.
-- Linux
GTK+ is already included in most Linux distributions
-- Sun/Solaris (http://www.sunfreeware.com)
Provides Sun packages of GTK+ v2.2.4 (a bit old).
You'll need to write a small installation script to
test for the presence of GTK, atk, glib, and pango.
-- SGI/Irix (http://freeware.sgi.com)
Similar issues as Sun; GTK+ v2.4.0.
Note: Sun and SGI are beginning to bundle GTK+ in new
systems. I just received a new Sun v240 server with GTK+
installed.
-- Mac/OSX
Have not found a good solution for Mac OSX.
The GTK+OSX sourceforge project (Aqua-based) is dead.
Darwinpost.org provides an X11-based0 port.
Joe Vl
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]