Re: Order of widgets when displayed on top of each other
- From: Paul Davis <paul linuxaudiosystems com>
- To: Murray Cumming Comneon com
- Cc: david davemalcolm demon co uk, dav cs utah edu, gtk-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Order of widgets when displayed on top of each other
- Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 10:40:48 -0400
>It's hard to get stuff into GTK+ because GTK+ has very high quality levels.
it does for additions. yet we've had misdesigned stuff like the combo
and the file selector around for years. that's where the paradox lies:
i love the high standards for additions, but it wasn't applied to the
first round of widgets GTK+ got. ok, i understand the rationale: "we
know its bad, but we're not replacing with something that isn't really
good". net result: misdesigned widgets that live for years.
>That's good. If people want something to go into GTK+ then they have to be
>prepared to discuss it thoroughly, provide rationale, and go through a few
>iterations until they get it right. So far nobody has done that for these
>things. It's not up to the GTK+ maintainers to do it all. Stuff happens when
>people care enough about it to do it themselves.
but when there is no sign that you can ever succeed in adding a widget
unless you are part of the core team, the motivation to try is a bit
hard to come up with. and that really *is* my perception: if you're
not owen or havoc or tim, don't bother thinking you can add a new
widget to GTK+. i know i'm not the only person who thinks this,
although i'm open to the possibility that its wrong.
>> * knobs
>
>Now you are just being rude.
???
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]