Re: GtkPreview changed behaviour
- From: Sven Neumann <sven gimp org>
- To: maurits rijk philips com
- Cc: gtk-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GtkPreview changed behaviour
- Date: 24 Apr 2002 13:11:11 +0200
Hi,
maurits rijk philips com writes:
> >are you sure? I had a quick look at the state of the plug-in in CVS
> >and it seems as if preview_move() gets called since the coordinates
> >in the statusbar are correctly updated.
>
> Yep, that's one of the things I don't understand: the preview_move() get's
> called, but the button_motion() isn't, even though both are connected to
> the same event ("motion_notify_event"). Which makes me think right now
> that I might have used the wrong declaration for preview_move(). If it's
> supposed to return a value (will look that up this evening) I can imagine
> that the other callback function is never called.
sure, all event callbacks have a gboolean return value (they used to
have in 1.2 too) and the signal emission is stopped after the first
signal handler returns TRUE indicating that it has handled the
event. I was assuming you read
http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/gtk/gtk-changes-2-0.html
Especially the part that says
"In GTK+ 1.2, if an event handler returned TRUE it prevented
propagation of that event to parent widgets. That is, the event signal
would not be emitted on parent widgets. In GTK+ 2.0, if an event
handler returns TRUE, the current signal emission on the current
widget is immediately stopped. That is, other callbacks connected to
the signal will not be invoked."
> >The use of GDK_MOTION_NOTIFY as an event_mask (see your PREVIEW_MASK
> >definition) is wrong by the way. It didn't do any harm however.
>
> Ah, ok I just copied that part from another plugin a long time ago. Why
> shouldn't it be used and can I just remove it?
it is not part of the GDK_EVENT_MASK enum, you should just remove it.
Salut, Sven
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]