Re: GScanner
- From: Paul Davis <pbd Op Net>
- To: gtk-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GScanner
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 11:15:20 -0500
>flex is slower by orders of magnitude and gets very
>inefficient as many static symbols arrive.
>gscanner can also be used pretty esily to tokenize
>in memory strings without generating lexing tables
>and its runtime configurable for most things.
if it integrated more naturally with bison, these might seem like
better arguments :) i could *perhaps* live without flex's input file,
but making do without a bison grammar file as the basis for a parser
seems like a sure way towards madness. but then again, i've never
tried to use gscanner and bison, so perhaps its easier than it looks.
i also don't recall how much support for regexps gscanner has. i
should go and look.
--p
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]