RE: editor with syntax highlighting for GTK+/GNOME API



Taybin,
You are very right. Like I've said, i've wrote an update for jext, that has
GTK+ API
highlighting. It took me a while to find all API calls I can find. Still,
i've missed a lot. But sinse it's written in Java, and uses GUI, it's not
something I'm going to use,
because of slow performance of Java on the front end, etc. I've just started
to write
GTK+ applications, and I love it. 
Thanks,
John.

-----Original Message-----
From: Taybin Rutkin [mailto:trutkin physics clarku edu]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 12:19 PM
To: gtk-list gnome org
Subject: Re: editor with syntax highlighting for GTK+/GNOME API


On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Paul Davis wrote:

> >Thanks Alfons,
> >but it doesnt hightlight GTK+/GNOME API, it does for regular C, etc.
> 
> the GTK+ and GNOME API's are written in C. what on earth does it mean
> to "highlight" the API of a particular library?

I know what he's asking for.  I used to use a basic editor for the
macintosh called FutureBasic that highlight all the macintosh system calls
as well as the reserved words.

Try glimmer.  It seems to highlight certain gtk+ calls.  Or at least it is
intelligent to recognize macros and highlight those.  Also, gide support
two or three scripting languages to customize highlighting.  That would
probably be the easiest way to get what you want.  And if you write a
script to do that yourself, don't forget to release it; I think I might be
interested in such a feature.

Taybin Rutkin


_______________________________________________
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list

NOTICE:  This communication may contain confidential or other privileged information.  If you are not the intended recipient, or believe that you have received this communication in error, please do not print, copy, retransmit, disseminate, or otherwise use the information.  Also, please indicate to the sender that you have received this email in error, and delete the copy you received.  Any communication that does not relate to official Columbia business is that of the sender and is neither given nor endorsed by Columbia.  Thank you.






[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]