Re: wait for a condition to be satisfied
- From: "bowman" <bowman montana com>
- To: <gtk-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: wait for a condition to be satisfied
- Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 21:24:38 -0600
From: "Helmethead" <hoshem mel comcen com au>
> > Secondly, sleep() (and usleep()) are not thread-safe, are they? is there
> > anything thread-safe as a replacement for sleep()? (I heard about
g_sleep
> > but "grep -r g_sleep /usr/include/*" gives no results)
>
> Dahm, I heard something like this but I can't remember or find anything in
the pthreads docs. I don't program in threads.. I can do a better job of
scheduling my simultaneous tasks than the linux kernel any day ;-)
for what it's worth, nanosleep() is the usual thread-safe sleep. it works a
little differently, but the
man nanosleep page should clarify it.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]